Software Alternatives & Reviews

Hugo VS Progress Sitefinity

Compare Hugo VS Progress Sitefinity and see what are their differences

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

Progress Sitefinity logo Progress Sitefinity

Sitefinity's web content management software is a marketing command center to drive growth for your business. Easily manage multi-site experiences deployed your way.
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • Progress Sitefinity Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25

Hugo videos

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

Progress Sitefinity videos

No Progress Sitefinity videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hugo and Progress Sitefinity)
Blogging
79 79%
21% 21
CMS
68 68%
32% 32
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging Platform
58 58%
42% 42

User comments

Share your experience with using Hugo and Progress Sitefinity. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hugo and Progress Sitefinity

Hugo Reviews

10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com
Hugo or Jekyll? 6 Factors You Should Know
Hugo is blazingly fast. We previously released a post on the performance of Hugo and Jekyll and compared the two. Hugo was the clear winner.
Source: forestry.io

Progress Sitefinity Reviews

34 Headless CMS That Should Be On Your Radar
Bedford MA.-based Progress Sitefinity is a web content management system built to engage customers across the entire customer lifecycle.
Source: www.cmswire.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 354 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hugo mentions (354)

  • Building static websites
    At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
  • Creating excerpts in Astro
    This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
    We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation
    In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 5 Open-Source Documentation Development Platforms of 2024
    Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

Progress Sitefinity mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Progress Sitefinity yet. Tracking of Progress Sitefinity recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hugo and Progress Sitefinity, you can also consider the following products

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Drupal - Drupal - the leading open-source CMS for ambitious digital experiences that reach your audience across multiple channels. Because we all have different needs, Drupal allows you to create a unique space in a world of cookie-cutter solutions.

Joomla - Joomla! is the mobile-ready and user-friendly way to build your website. Choose from thousands of features and designs. Joomla! is free and open source.

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React