Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

httpbin(1) VS Websecurify

Compare httpbin(1) VS Websecurify and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

httpbin(1) logo httpbin(1)

HTTP request and response service

Websecurify logo Websecurify

Websecurify free and premium security tools automatically scan websites for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross-site Scripting and others
  • httpbin(1) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-05
  • Websecurify Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-16

httpbin(1) features and specs

  • Simple Testing
    httpbin provides a straightforward way to test HTTP requests, allowing developers to send requests and see responses without setting up a server.
  • Variety of Endpoints
    It offers a variety of endpoints like /get, /post, /put, /delete, and more, which are useful for testing different types of HTTP methods.
  • Request Inspection
    The service allows users to inspect various parts of the HTTP request, including headers, data, and status codes, which is invaluable for debugging.
  • Free and Open Source
    httpbin is free to use and is open-source, which makes it accessible for all developers and allows for community contributions.
  • Ease of Use
    With a clean, minimalistic interface, it is easy for developers to understand and start utilizing immediately without a steep learning curve.

Possible disadvantages of httpbin(1)

  • Not for Production Use
    httpbin is designed for testing and demonstration purposes only and is not suitable for live production environments as it lacks security features.
  • Limited to HTTP
    The service is limited to HTTP protocol testing and does not support more advanced use cases or protocols beyond simple HTTP methods.
  • Public Environment
    Since httpbin is publicly accessible, it’s not suitable for testing private or sensitive data, as requests might be logged or visible to others.
  • Potential Rate Limiting
    As a public service, there may be rate limiting or performance bottlenecks during peak usage times, which could affect testing workflows.
  • Lack of Customization
    Users cannot customize the httpbin endpoints to fit specialized use cases or requirements due to its general-purpose design.

Websecurify features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Websecurify offers a clean and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced security professionals to use effectively.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The tool is designed to work across different platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing flexibility for users operating on various systems.
  • Automated Testing
    Websecurify provides automated web application security testing, which helps in identifying vulnerabilities efficiently and saves time for security teams.
  • Real-Time Results
    The tool offers real-time analysis and reporting, allowing users to view results instantly and take immediate action on discovered vulnerabilities.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    It generates detailed reports that include vulnerability summaries, technical findings, and remediation suggestions, which are valuable for documentation and compliance purposes.

Possible disadvantages of Websecurify

  • Limited Deep Scanning Features
    Compared to more advanced security tools, Websecurify may lack some deep scanning capabilities that are necessary for thoroughly assessing complex applications.
  • Potential for False Positives
    Like many automated security tools, there is a possibility of encountering false positives, which may require additional validation by security experts.
  • Market Competition
    Websecurify faces strong competition from other established security testing tools that may offer more extensive features and integrations.
  • Limited Customer Support
    Some users may experience limitations in customer support options, which can be a drawback if immediate assistance or guidance is needed.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, there could be a learning curve involved with utilizing more advanced features and settings.

Analysis of Websecurify

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Websecurify is considered a good tool for web application security. It effectively helps developers and security professionals identify vulnerabilities and enhance the security posture of their applications.

Why this product is good

  • Websecurify is regarded as a comprehensive solution for web application security. It offers automated scanning capabilities to identify vulnerabilities, detailed reports, and supports various web technologies. It's popular because of its usability, robust features, and regular updates that keep up with the latest security threats.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to scan their web applications for vulnerabilities
  • Security professionals performing routine security assessments
  • Organizations needing to maintain a secure development lifecycle and ensure compliance with security standards

httpbin(1) videos

No httpbin(1) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Websecurify videos

+ Add

Websecurify Promo Video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to httpbin(1) and Websecurify)

httpbin(1)

Websecurify

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Security
0 0%
Security
100% 100
API Tools
100 100%
API Tools
0% 0
Web Application Security
0 0%
Web Application Security
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using httpbin(1) and Websecurify. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, httpbin(1) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 59 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

httpbin(1) mentions (59)

  • WebAssembly on Kubernetes
    The use case should be more advanced than Hello World to highlight the capabilities of WebAssembly. I've implemented an HTTP server mimicking a single endpoint of the excellent httpbin API testing utility. The code itself is not essential as the post is not about Rust, but in case you're interested, you can find it on GitHub. I add a field to the response to explicitly return the underlying approach, respectively... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Using cURL Inside a Docker Container
    For example, If we want to test sending HTTP requests, we can use the service httpbin. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Create your K3S lab on Google Cloud
    Create a Dockerfile for your app, we will use the HttpBin API which allows to test all the request we can make to a Rest API :. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Host a Reverse Proxy in Seconds
    Curl --request POST -d '{"message":"hello"}' \ Https://matts-org-a0696.blackbird-relay.a8r.io/proxy/post { "args": {}, "data": "{\"message\":\"hello\"}", "files": {}, "form": {}, "headers": { "Accept": "*/*", "Content-Length": "19", "Content-Type": "application/json", "Host": "httpbin.org", "User-Agent": "curl/8.6.0" }, "json": { "message": "hello" }, "url":... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Metrics Can Fool You: Measuring Execution Time in Connection-Pooled Environments
    To simulate delays in the external service, we will use the httpbin Docker image. Httpbin provides an easy-to-use HTTP request and response service, which we can use to create artificial delays in our requests. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Websecurify mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Websecurify yet. Tracking of Websecurify recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing httpbin(1) and Websecurify, you can also consider the following products

HTTPDump - A simple, beautiful Webhook debugging tool.

BreachLock - BreachLock is a versatile platform that provides scalable and smooth penetration testing services for vulnerabilities.

Endpoints - View and respond to requests on an HTTP endpoint

Tenable.io - Tenable.io Cyber Exposure platform helps to protect any asset on any computing platform and eliminate blind spots.

Requestly - A Powerful API Mocking and Testing Tool

Detectify - Detectify provides a user friendly and thorough web security scan that allows you to focus 100% on web development.

Loading...