Software Alternatives & Reviews

HTTP VS mini_httpd

Compare HTTP VS mini_httpd and see what are their differences


is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.
HTTP Landing Page
HTTP Landing Page
mini_httpd Landing Page
mini_httpd Landing Page

HTTP details

Categories
Web Browser Cloud Storage P2P
Website datatracker.ietf.org  

mini_httpd details

Categories
Web And Application Servers Web Servers Application Server
Website acme.com  

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP and mini_httpd)
26
26%
74%
74
100
100%
0%
0
0
0%
100%
100

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTP mentions (4)

  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
    It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Let's Stop Building APIs Around a Network Hack
    This is wrong. HTTP/1.0 had a keep-alive header field as mentioned in the HTTP/1.1 RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#appendix-A.1.2 But in HTTP/1.1 that's the default: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-6.3
       o  If the received protocol is HTTP/1.1 (or later), the connection will persist after the current response; else,.
    - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • An HTTP server in a single .c file
    Context: RFC 2616 and RFC 7230 require CRLF line endings instead of just LF. 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

mini_httpd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of mini_httpd yet. Tracking of mini_httpd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP and mini_httpd, you can also consider the following products

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.

Wildfly - WildFly is a flexible, lightweight application server.

ZeroNet - ZeroNet. Open, free and uncensorable websites, using Bitcoin cryptography and BitTorrent network. Download for Windows 9. 6MB · Unpack · Run ZeroNet. exe.

User reviews

Share your experience with using HTTP and mini_httpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review