http.garden VS Reflect.run
Compare http.garden VS Reflect.run and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
http.garden
HTTP Status Dogs
Decoder
HTTP Status Tester
HTTP Status Cats
HTTP Toolkit
Slack
The QR Code Generator
Reflect.run
Selenium
Testim
Ghost Inspector
Testsigma
Cypress.io
PreFlight
LambdaTest
Reflect is a tool that helps you test any website without writing any code. All you need to create a test is a URL. Our cloud-based browser allows you to interact with your website just like a normal browser. Behind the scenes, Reflect captures all of your actions and builds a repeatable test script. When you're finished, you can run that test script whenever you want within our automated platform. So, if you can use your site, you can test your site.
Reflect supports nearly all browser interactions out-of-the-box, including hovers and drag-and-drops. It offers visual assertions for ensuring the appearance of your webapp, and includes test editing functionality and API access.
http.garden Reflect.runNo features have been listed yet.
No http.garden videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Reflect.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Playwright is good but there is also other kind of tools like https://reflect.run/ and https://ghostinspector.com/ that are perfect for end user testing. Hope it helps. Source: about 1 year ago
Is it possible to personalize your pitches to individual users? At our startup [1] we try to get straight to point when pitching the product and demo something that is as close as possible to how the person we're talking to would actually use the product. For example, here's a video I just recorded a few minutes ago for someone that I've been talking to via email:... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I've definitely had reflect.run on my radar, and agreed on the expensive AF part, mind if I reach out for your thoughts on what lead you/your team down to reflect.run and your experience with it so far? 😄. Source: about 2 years ago
Checkout reflect.run we just started using it. Expensive AF but pretty nice. Source: about 2 years ago
Yes definitely, there's lots of products in the QA space trying to tackle the problem you're describing. I'm a co-founder of a no-code product in the space (https://reflect.run). Being no-code has the advantage of enabling all QA testers to build test automation, regardless of coding experience. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
HTTP Status Dogs - Hypertext Transfer Protocol Response status codes, and dogs
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
Decoder - Instantly decode error and status codes
Testim - Stable, self-healing, end-to-end test automation via machine learning. Testim helps accelerate the delivery of high-quality software. Speed up test-authoring and improve the stability of automated, end-to-end tests.
HTTP Status Tester - Test URLs in bulk for their HTTP responses, by ex-Google
Ghost Inspector - Easily create automated browser tests for your websites and web apps. Ensure everything works and looks the way it should. No coding required. 14 day free trial!