Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

http.garden VS DebugBear

Compare http.garden VS DebugBear and see what are their differences

http.garden logo http.garden

Gardening for every HTTP status code, by ex-Google.

DebugBear logo DebugBear

Track site speed and Core Web Vitals
  • http.garden Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-02
  • DebugBear Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-03

Monitor the performance of your website and benchmark against the competition. Get alerted in Slack or by email when there's a problem.

Continuously test the speed of your website in a controlled lab environment and get in-depth reports to optimize your site. DebugBear is built on top of Lighthouse, but provides debug data that goes far beyond the basic Lighthouse report.

In addition to the lab data, DebugBear also keeps track of the real-user data collected by Google.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to http.garden and DebugBear)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Website Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Performance Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using http.garden and DebugBear. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing http.garden and DebugBear, you can also consider the following products

Decoder - Instantly decode error and status codes

GTmetrix - GTmetrix is a free tool that analyzes your page's speed performance. Using PageSpeed and YSlow, GTmetrix generates scores for your pages and offers actionable recommendations on how to fix them.

HTTP Status Dogs - Hypertext Transfer Protocol Response status codes, and dogs

SpeedCurve - Monitor your front-end. Beat the competition

HTTP Status Tester - Test URLs in bulk for their HTTP responses, by ex-Google

Wattspeed - Wattspeed helps you measure and monitor the performance of your website.