Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Heroku VS Link Shell Extension

Compare Heroku VS Link Shell Extension and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

Heroku logo Heroku

Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Link Shell Extension logo Link Shell Extension

Link Shell Extension (LSE) provides for the creation of Hardlinks , Junctions , Volume Mountpoints...
  • Heroku Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • Link Shell Extension Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-18

Heroku features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Heroku offers an extremely user-friendly interface and a high level of abstraction, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment
    One of Heroku’s strongest points is the ability to deploy applications quickly using Git. Developers can push their code to Heroku with a simple command, streamlining the entire process.
  • Scalability
    Heroku provides effortless scaling options by allowing developers to add more dynos (containers) with a single command to handle increased traffic and workload.
  • Add-Ons Ecosystem
    Heroku offers a rich ecosystem of add-ons, such as databases, caching, monitoring, and more, which can be easily integrated into applications to extend their functionality.
  • Automatic Updates
    Heroku automatically handles operating system and server updates, allowing developers to focus solely on their application code rather than maintenance tasks.
  • Free Tier
    Heroku offers a free tier with sufficient resources to host small projects and learn the platform without incurring costs, making it accessible for beginners and small-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku

  • Cost
    While Heroku offers a free tier, the costs can quickly add up for larger applications and professional use. Paid plans and additional dynos or add-ons can become expensive.
  • Performance
    Heroku’s performance can sometimes be suboptimal compared to other cloud providers, particularly when running high-performance or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Control
    Heroku abstracts away a lot of infrastructure management, which can be a downside for developers who need fine-grained control over their environments and configurations.
  • Dyno Sleeping
    Applications running on Heroku’s free tier experience 'dyno sleeping,' where the application goes to sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, causing a delay when it wakes up after receiving a new request.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Heroku’s ecosystem and platform-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another platform if needed.
  • Add-On Costs
    The costs for add-ons can also become significant, as many useful features and integrations require paid add-ons, increasing the overall expense.

Link Shell Extension features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Link Shell Extension provides an easy-to-use graphical interface for creating hard links, junctions, and symbolic links, making it accessible for users who are not comfortable using command-line tools.
  • Integration with Windows Explorer
    The tool integrates seamlessly with Windows Explorer, allowing users to create and manage links through right-click context menus, enhancing usability and efficiency.
  • Comprehensive Link Types
    It supports a wide range of link types, including hard links, junctions, and symbolic links, offering flexibility for various use cases and needs.
  • Free to Use
    Link Shell Extension is a freeware, providing an accessible option for users who need to manage links without any cost.

Possible disadvantages of Link Shell Extension

  • Windows Only
    The tool is designed specifically for Windows, limiting its availability and utility to users who work across different operating systems.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    While it covers basic functionalities, some advanced features found in other professional tools are missing, which might be a limitation for power users.
  • Dependency on File System
    Link Shell Extension's functionality depends on NTFS file systems, meaning users operating under different environments might encounter compatibility issues.
  • Confusing for Beginners
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the concept of links (especially hard and symbolic links) might still be confusing for beginners who are unfamiliar with file systems and links.

Analysis of Heroku

Overall verdict

  • Heroku is a solid choice for developers seeking a straightforward, cloud-based solution for deploying and managing applications. However, it may not be the most cost-effective option for large-scale or data-intensive applications.

Why this product is good

  • Heroku is a popular platform as a service (PaaS) due to its ease of use, fast deployment process, and robust support for multiple programming languages. It allows developers to focus on building applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. Heroku offers scaling capabilities, a wide variety of add-ons, and a strong developer community.

Recommended for

    Heroku is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized applications, hobby projects, and developers who value ease of use and quick deployment cycles. It is particularly suited for those who are developing web applications in languages such as Ruby, Node.js, Python, and others supported by the platform.

Heroku videos

What is Heroku | Ask a Dev Episode 14

More videos:

Link Shell Extension videos

Link Shell Extension

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku and Link Shell Extension)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku and Link Shell Extension. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Heroku and Link Shell Extension

Heroku Reviews

  1. mark-mercer
    Useful Cloud Platform

    Great service to build, run and manage applications entirely in the cloud!

    🏁 Competitors: Amazon AWS, Dokku on Digital Ocean, Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy user interface|Good customer service|Multi-language cloud application platform
    👎 Cons:    Limitation with some addons|Low network performance
  2. jamestelford
    · Full Stack Developer at OutDev ·
    🏁 Competitors: Docker, Amazon AWS
    👍 Pros:    Powerful development environments|Great value for the money|Great customer support|Paas

10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Heroku’s focus on simplicity and developer experience makes it a perfect fit for those who want to focus on building their apps, not babysitting servers. Startups and small businesses, in particular, can benefit from Heroku’s ability to accelerate development and deployment, allowing them to get their ideas to market faster.
Source: genezio.com
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Heroku Postgres – Majority of businesses like Heroku because of its SQL database support. Yes, PostgreSQL as a service is an appealing product of this PaaS vendor with quick deployment approaches.
5 Free Heroku Alternatives with Free Plan for Developers
Koyeb is a decent alternative to Heroku that you can consider for hosting or deploying your web apps and APIs. It has all the features of Heroku that you will need for your projects. So far, I have not encountered an importer tool for migrating Heroku deployments but I am sure doing that manually will not be that hard. Just like Heroku it offers you an intuitive web UI as...
Choosing the best Next.js hosting platform
However, there are a few disadvantages to Heroku. First of all, despite its build pack, Heroku will run your project as a Node.js application. As a result, you will lose some of Next.js’ most interesting features, such as Incremental Static Regeneration. Analytics are replaced by metrics and measured throughput, response time, and memory usage (only on paid plans).
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Heroku is another alternative to Netlify that doesn’t only host static websites but has the ability to host dynamic websites. This PaaS platform was launched in 2007 and conferred highly scalable features to deploy, host and launch applications.

Link Shell Extension Reviews

We have no reviews of Link Shell Extension yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Heroku should be more popular than Link Shell Extension. It has been mentiond 73 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku mentions (73)

View more

Link Shell Extension mentions (8)

  • Is there a way to prevent files from being easily deleted?
    If you have games without installers you can create hardlink copies elsewhere on the same drive. It won't take any extra HD space and keeps the files safe regardless of what happens to the torrent directory Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_link Https://schinagl.priv.at/nt/hardlinkshellext/hardlinkshellext.html. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Can’t launch Battlefield 4
    Linux folks are used to using symbolic links but if you're on Windows (been a while for me) you can use this to make a symbolic link to your game folder, that's what I've done in the past. Just delete the folder is assumes is your game folder, right-click and create a link there after you've copied your game folder. Source: about 2 years ago
  • One-way backup with OneDrive
    Get Link Shell Extension from here: https://schinagl.priv.at/nt/hardlinkshellext/hardlinkshellext.html . It adds context menu to right-click, where you can create various types of symbolic link/junctions. It also integrates easy handling of removing those links. Alternatively, you will need to manually use a "mklink" Windows command, mklink /J "C:\LinkToFolder" "C:\Users\Name\OriginalFolder" and later you will... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Got the Steam Deck Dock!
    Windows NTFS does support symbolic links. Link Shell Extension will add them to the Explorer right-click context menu for easier usage. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why you should make a second account for Master Duel - An In-depth Explanation
    Also if you don't want to have another copy of a 5GB folder you could just make a symbolic link to the original 0000 folder. (Use https://schinagl.priv.at/nt/hardlinkshellext/hardlinkshellext.html it's super easy. Right click original 0000 folder pick as source, drop 0000 folder as a symbolic link on the other folder). Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku and Link Shell Extension, you can also consider the following products

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

FileMenu Tools - FileMenu Tools lets you customize the context (right-click) menu of Windows Explorer.

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.

Symlink Creator - Symbolic Link Creator. GUI for mklink (Microsoft Windows symlink utility).

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

Symlinker - Symbolic Link Creator. GUI for mklink, Microsoft Windows symlink utility