Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Heroku VS Jumpshare

Compare Heroku VS Jumpshare and see what are their differences

InfinyHost
Smart hosting solutions for small businesses, eCommerce, and personal websites. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Heroku logo Heroku

Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Jumpshare logo Jumpshare

Jumpshare is a visual sharing platform to help creatives share their work and collaborate with team and clients.
  • Heroku Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • Jumpshare Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-08

Heroku features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Heroku offers an extremely user-friendly interface and a high level of abstraction, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment
    One of Heroku’s strongest points is the ability to deploy applications quickly using Git. Developers can push their code to Heroku with a simple command, streamlining the entire process.
  • Scalability
    Heroku provides effortless scaling options by allowing developers to add more dynos (containers) with a single command to handle increased traffic and workload.
  • Add-Ons Ecosystem
    Heroku offers a rich ecosystem of add-ons, such as databases, caching, monitoring, and more, which can be easily integrated into applications to extend their functionality.
  • Automatic Updates
    Heroku automatically handles operating system and server updates, allowing developers to focus solely on their application code rather than maintenance tasks.
  • Free Tier
    Heroku offers a free tier with sufficient resources to host small projects and learn the platform without incurring costs, making it accessible for beginners and small-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku

  • Cost
    While Heroku offers a free tier, the costs can quickly add up for larger applications and professional use. Paid plans and additional dynos or add-ons can become expensive.
  • Performance
    Heroku’s performance can sometimes be suboptimal compared to other cloud providers, particularly when running high-performance or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Control
    Heroku abstracts away a lot of infrastructure management, which can be a downside for developers who need fine-grained control over their environments and configurations.
  • Dyno Sleeping
    Applications running on Heroku’s free tier experience 'dyno sleeping,' where the application goes to sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, causing a delay when it wakes up after receiving a new request.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Heroku’s ecosystem and platform-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another platform if needed.
  • Add-On Costs
    The costs for add-ons can also become significant, as many useful features and integrations require paid add-ons, increasing the overall expense.

Jumpshare features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Jumpshare provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it simple for users to upload and share files quickly.
  • Quick Sharing
    The platform allows for rapid file sharing through drag-and-drop functionality and instant link generation, improving workflow efficiency.
  • Real-Time Collaboration
    Users can collaborate in real time with shared notes, comments, and responses which is beneficial for teamwork and project management.
  • Wide Range of File Types
    Jumpshare supports a broad spectrum of file types including documents, images, videos, and more, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Security Features
    Offers robust security features like password protection and self-destructing links to ensure that sensitive data remains confidential.
  • Integrations
    Integrates with popular tools and platforms such as Slack, Trello, and Asana, enhancing its utility within existing workflows.
  • Annotation Tools
    Built-in annotation tools allow users to markup files directly within the platform, facilitating clear communication around shared documents.

Possible disadvantages of Jumpshare

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free version of Jumpshare has storage and feature limitations, which might not be sufficient for power users or large teams.
  • File Size Limits
    Imposes file size limits on uploads in the free tier, which can be restrictive for users needing to share large files.
  • Subscription Costs
    Subscription plans can become costly, especially for small businesses or individual users who need more advanced features.
  • Internet Dependent
    Requires a stable internet connection for optimal use, which could be a drawback in areas with unreliable connectivity.
  • Potential Overheads
    The real-time collaboration and sharing features might introduce overheads and distractions for some users, hindering focus.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with any online sharing tool, there may be concerns over data privacy and the risk of unauthorized access.

Analysis of Heroku

Overall verdict

  • Heroku is a solid choice for developers seeking a straightforward, cloud-based solution for deploying and managing applications. However, it may not be the most cost-effective option for large-scale or data-intensive applications.

Why this product is good

  • Heroku is a popular platform as a service (PaaS) due to its ease of use, fast deployment process, and robust support for multiple programming languages. It allows developers to focus on building applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. Heroku offers scaling capabilities, a wide variety of add-ons, and a strong developer community.

Recommended for

    Heroku is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized applications, hobby projects, and developers who value ease of use and quick deployment cycles. It is particularly suited for those who are developing web applications in languages such as Ruby, Node.js, Python, and others supported by the platform.

Analysis of Jumpshare

Overall verdict

  • Jumpshare is a solid choice for those looking for a versatile file-sharing and screen capture tool. Its array of features supports productivity and collaboration, making it a valuable tool in both personal and professional settings.

Why this product is good

  • Jumpshare is known for its easy-to-use file-sharing capabilities with a focus on instantly sharing screenshots, screen recordings, and large files through the cloud. It offers a seamless user experience with quick drag-and-drop options and sharing through links. The platform is especially useful for creative professionals, businesses, and teams requiring collaboration with features like annotation, team folders, and real-time commenting on shared items.

Recommended for

  • Creative professionals who need to share media files quickly and efficiently.
  • Teams and businesses seeking enhanced collaboration tools.
  • Individuals looking for an intuitive platform for daily file sharing and storage.

Heroku videos

+ Add

What is Heroku | Ask a Dev Episode 14

More videos:

Jumpshare videos

+ Add

Introducing Jumpshare for Windows

More videos:

  • Review - Jumpshare for iPhone (HD) - Real Time File Sharing
  • Review - Websites [03] - Jumpshare.Com

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku and Jumpshare)

Heroku

Jumpshare

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
File Sharing
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku and Jumpshare. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Heroku and Jumpshare

Heroku Reviews

  1. mark-mercer
    Useful Cloud Platform

    Great service to build, run and manage applications entirely in the cloud!

    🏁 Competitors: Amazon AWS, Dokku on Digital Ocean, Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy user interface|Good customer service|Multi-language cloud application platform
    👎 Cons:    Limitation with some addons|Low network performance
  2. jamestelford
    · Full Stack Developer at OutDev ·
    🏁 Competitors: Docker, Amazon AWS
    👍 Pros:    Powerful development environments|Great value for the money|Great customer support|Paas
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Heroku’s focus on simplicity and developer experience makes it a perfect fit for those who want to focus on building their apps, not babysitting servers. Startups and small businesses, in particular, can benefit from Heroku’s ability to accelerate development and deployment, allowing them to get their ideas to market faster.
Source: genezio.com
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Heroku Postgres – Majority of businesses like Heroku because of its SQL database support. Yes, PostgreSQL as a service is an appealing product of this PaaS vendor with quick deployment approaches.
Source: digitalcruch.com
5 Free Heroku Alternatives with Free Plan for Developers
Koyeb is a decent alternative to Heroku that you can consider for hosting or deploying your web apps and APIs. It has all the features of Heroku that you will need for your projects. So far, I have not encountered an importer tool for migrating Heroku deployments but I am sure doing that manually will not be that hard. Just like Heroku it offers you an intuitive web UI as...
Source: www.ilovefreesoftware.com
Choosing the best Next.js hosting platform
However, there are a few disadvantages to Heroku. First of all, despite its build pack, Heroku will run your project as a Node.js application. As a result, you will lose some of Next.js’ most interesting features, such as Incremental Static Regeneration. Analytics are replaced by metrics and measured throughput, response time, and memory usage (only on paid plans).
Source: blog.logrocket.com
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Heroku is another alternative to Netlify that doesn’t only host static websites but has the ability to host dynamic websites. This PaaS platform was launched in 2007 and conferred highly scalable features to deploy, host and launch applications.
Source: blog.back4app.com

Jumpshare Reviews

We have no reviews of Jumpshare yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Heroku seems to be a lot more popular than Jumpshare. While we know about 73 links to Heroku, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Jumpshare. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku mentions (73)

View more

Jumpshare mentions (6)

  • How I Achieved 10x Productivity at Remote Work
    I first started working remotely in early 2014 when I was working as a Senior Full-Stack Developer at Jumpshare. I found it different yet intuitive from the very beginning. While working in the same physical space as your peers has its advantages, in remote work however you’ve full control of your environment and surroundings and the best part (for me) is the silence which helps in staying focused. Even though... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Atlassian to buy Loom for nearly $1B
    You can try out Jumpshare (https://jumpshare.com). We are seeing many people move to our platform from Loom. I am the founder so feel free to ask anything. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Deep Learning with “AWS Graviton2 + NVIDIA Tensor T4G” for as low as free* with CUDA 12.2
    At Jumpshare , where I hold the position of VP of Engineering, we have successfully turned these challenges into opportunities. Were passionate about implementing the techniques like this to make our machine learning inference tasks more cost-effective. By leveraging the power of AWS Graviton2 and NVIDIA Tensor T4G instances, weve been able to drastically reduce operational costs without compromising performance. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • HopToDesk – Free Remote Desktop Software for Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS
    I was trying to find this thread again, https://jumpshare.com/ The logos look really similar.... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Why aren't devs making desktop apps any more
    We're building native desktop apps at https://jumpshare.com. However, it's hard. Very hard. Everyone in our industry has moved towards Electron but we've resisted it for a long time. I have always believed that native experience is the best in the long run. The downside is that it takes more time to build the same feature across two different platforms but this is a risk we're willing to take to provide a superior... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku and Jumpshare, you can also consider the following products

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

Dropbox - Online Sync and File Sharing

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.

WeTransfer - WeTransfer is a free service to send big or small files from A to B.

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

Ge.tt - The best way to publish and share your files.

Loading...