Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Heroku VS Google Cloud Load Balancing

Compare Heroku VS Google Cloud Load Balancing and see what are their differences

InfinyHost
Smart hosting solutions for small businesses, eCommerce, and personal websites. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Heroku logo Heroku

Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Google Cloud Load Balancing logo Google Cloud Load Balancing

Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.
  • Heroku Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • Google Cloud Load Balancing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-29

Heroku features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Heroku offers an extremely user-friendly interface and a high level of abstraction, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment
    One of Heroku’s strongest points is the ability to deploy applications quickly using Git. Developers can push their code to Heroku with a simple command, streamlining the entire process.
  • Scalability
    Heroku provides effortless scaling options by allowing developers to add more dynos (containers) with a single command to handle increased traffic and workload.
  • Add-Ons Ecosystem
    Heroku offers a rich ecosystem of add-ons, such as databases, caching, monitoring, and more, which can be easily integrated into applications to extend their functionality.
  • Automatic Updates
    Heroku automatically handles operating system and server updates, allowing developers to focus solely on their application code rather than maintenance tasks.
  • Free Tier
    Heroku offers a free tier with sufficient resources to host small projects and learn the platform without incurring costs, making it accessible for beginners and small-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku

  • Cost
    While Heroku offers a free tier, the costs can quickly add up for larger applications and professional use. Paid plans and additional dynos or add-ons can become expensive.
  • Performance
    Heroku’s performance can sometimes be suboptimal compared to other cloud providers, particularly when running high-performance or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Control
    Heroku abstracts away a lot of infrastructure management, which can be a downside for developers who need fine-grained control over their environments and configurations.
  • Dyno Sleeping
    Applications running on Heroku’s free tier experience 'dyno sleeping,' where the application goes to sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, causing a delay when it wakes up after receiving a new request.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Heroku’s ecosystem and platform-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another platform if needed.
  • Add-On Costs
    The costs for add-ons can also become significant, as many useful features and integrations require paid add-ons, increasing the overall expense.

Google Cloud Load Balancing features and specs

  • Global Load Balancing
    Google Cloud Load Balancing allows for distributing traffic across multiple regions, ensuring high availability and reliability by automatically routing traffic to the closest or least loaded backend.
  • Scalability
    Automatically scales up and down based on traffic demands without manual intervention, providing consistent performance during traffic spikes.
  • Integrated Security
    Offers built-in DDoS protection, SSL/TLS termination, and support for IAM roles, enhancing the security of your applications.
  • User-friendly Console
    Provides an easy-to-use interface for configuring and managing load balancers, making deployment and monitoring straightforward.
  • Backend Health Monitoring
    Continuously checks the health of backend services and directs traffic only to healthy instances, ensuring uninterrupted service.
  • Support for Hybrid and Multi-cloud
    Seamlessly integrates with on-premises and other cloud environments, supporting diverse deployment scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Load Balancing

  • Complex Pricing
    Pricing can be complicated and may not be straightforward to calculate, potentially leading to unexpected costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Being a feature-rich service, it has a steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with Google Cloud or advanced load balancing concepts.
  • Region Availability
    Although it offers global load balancing, specific features may only be available in certain regions, limiting some capabilities depending on the location.
  • Dependency on Google Cloud Services
    Heavily integrated with other Google Cloud services, which may pose challenges if you need to work with third-party services or other cloud providers.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Advanced configurations might require in-depth understanding and careful planning, potentially increasing the time and effort needed for optimal setup.

Analysis of Heroku

Overall verdict

  • Heroku is a solid choice for developers seeking a straightforward, cloud-based solution for deploying and managing applications. However, it may not be the most cost-effective option for large-scale or data-intensive applications.

Why this product is good

  • Heroku is a popular platform as a service (PaaS) due to its ease of use, fast deployment process, and robust support for multiple programming languages. It allows developers to focus on building applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. Heroku offers scaling capabilities, a wide variety of add-ons, and a strong developer community.

Recommended for

    Heroku is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized applications, hobby projects, and developers who value ease of use and quick deployment cycles. It is particularly suited for those who are developing web applications in languages such as Ruby, Node.js, Python, and others supported by the platform.

Analysis of Google Cloud Load Balancing

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Google Cloud Load Balancing is considered good.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    Supports HTTP(S), TCP/SSL proxy, and UDP-based load balancing, allowing for a wide range of deployment scenarios.
  • Reliability
    Built on Google's robust infrastructure, it ensures high availability and reliability for applications and services.
  • Scalability
    Google Cloud Load Balancing offers automatic scaling to efficiently handle varying levels of incoming traffic.
  • Integrations
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud products and services, enhancing performance and management capabilities.
  • Global distribution
    It provides global load balancing with a single anycast IP address, which streamlines traffic management across multiple regions.

Recommended for

  • Businesses requiring high-availability and scalable web applications.
  • Organizations looking for a global presence with efficient traffic distribution.
  • Projects needing seamless integration with other Google Cloud services.

Heroku videos

+ Add

What is Heroku | Ask a Dev Episode 14

More videos:

Google Cloud Load Balancing videos

No Google Cloud Load Balancing videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku and Google Cloud Load Balancing)

Heroku

Google Cloud Load Balancing

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
0 0%
Web And Application Servers
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku and Google Cloud Load Balancing. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Heroku and Google Cloud Load Balancing

Heroku Reviews

  1. mark-mercer
    Useful Cloud Platform

    Great service to build, run and manage applications entirely in the cloud!

    🏁 Competitors: Amazon AWS, Dokku on Digital Ocean, Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy user interface|Good customer service|Multi-language cloud application platform
    👎 Cons:    Limitation with some addons|Low network performance
  2. jamestelford
    · Full Stack Developer at OutDev ·
    🏁 Competitors: Docker, Amazon AWS
    👍 Pros:    Powerful development environments|Great value for the money|Great customer support|Paas
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Heroku’s focus on simplicity and developer experience makes it a perfect fit for those who want to focus on building their apps, not babysitting servers. Startups and small businesses, in particular, can benefit from Heroku’s ability to accelerate development and deployment, allowing them to get their ideas to market faster.
Source: genezio.com
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Heroku Postgres – Majority of businesses like Heroku because of its SQL database support. Yes, PostgreSQL as a service is an appealing product of this PaaS vendor with quick deployment approaches.
Source: digitalcruch.com
5 Free Heroku Alternatives with Free Plan for Developers
Koyeb is a decent alternative to Heroku that you can consider for hosting or deploying your web apps and APIs. It has all the features of Heroku that you will need for your projects. So far, I have not encountered an importer tool for migrating Heroku deployments but I am sure doing that manually will not be that hard. Just like Heroku it offers you an intuitive web UI as...
Source: www.ilovefreesoftware.com
Choosing the best Next.js hosting platform
However, there are a few disadvantages to Heroku. First of all, despite its build pack, Heroku will run your project as a Node.js application. As a result, you will lose some of Next.js’ most interesting features, such as Incremental Static Regeneration. Analytics are replaced by metrics and measured throughput, response time, and memory usage (only on paid plans).
Source: blog.logrocket.com
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Heroku is another alternative to Netlify that doesn’t only host static websites but has the ability to host dynamic websites. This PaaS platform was launched in 2007 and conferred highly scalable features to deploy, host and launch applications.
Source: blog.back4app.com

Google Cloud Load Balancing Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Cloud Load Balancing yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Heroku should be more popular than Google Cloud Load Balancing. It has been mentiond 73 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku mentions (73)

View more

Google Cloud Load Balancing mentions (10)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku and Google Cloud Load Balancing, you can also consider the following products

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

Azure Traffic Manager - Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager allows you to control the distribution of user traffic for service endpoints in different datacenters.

Loading...