Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Heroku CI VS Stacktape

Compare Heroku CI VS Stacktape and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Heroku CI logo Heroku CI

Continuous Integration from Heroku

Stacktape logo Stacktape

Full power of AWS with Heroku-like experience
  • Heroku CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • Stacktape Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-10

Heroku CI features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Heroku CI is tightly integrated with Heroku Pipelines, making it easy to deploy successfully tested builds directly into different stages, streamlining the deployment process.
  • Easy Setup
    Heroku CI provides a straightforward setup process, particularly for existing Heroku applications. This makes it accessible for teams who are already using Heroku for their application hosting.
  • Ephemeral Test Environments
    Heroku CI automatically provisions and tears down application environments for tests, ensuring a clean state for each test run and reducing the likelihood of false positives/negatives caused by environment differences.
  • Built-in Support for Multiple Languages
    Offers native support for a variety of programming languages supported by Heroku, allowing diverse teams to implement CI processes without additional configuration.
  • Parallel Test Execution
    Enables parallel execution of test suites, which can significantly reduce overall testing time and speed up the development and deployment cycles.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku CI

  • Cost
    Heroku CI can be expensive for teams or projects that require many CI environments or frequent builds, as it operates on Heroku's dyno cost model.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to more robust CI/CD tools, Heroku CI offers less flexibility and customization options, which might be restrictive for complex build processes or unique testing requirements.
  • Integration Limitations
    While Heroku CI integrates well with Heroku Pipelines, it may not offer the same level of integration or support for other popular CI/CD tools and services, potentially complicating mixed-environment setups.
  • Performance Limitations
    The performance of the CI process is tied to the dyno types utilized in Heroku, and can be limited by the dyno configurations, impacting the speed and efficiency of running tests.
  • Dependency on Heroku Ecosystem
    Heroku CI is primarily beneficial if you are already using Heroku for deployment, which may not be suitable for teams relying on different cloud providers or those seeking vendor independence.

Stacktape features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Stacktape simplifies the process of managing cloud infrastructure by providing a user-friendly interface, which can save time and reduce errors for developers.
  • Integration
    It offers seamless integration with popular cloud service providers like AWS, allowing for flexible and comprehensive deployment and management of applications.
  • Cost Efficiency
    Stacktape can help manage and optimize cloud resources efficiently, potentially leading to cost savings through better resource allocation and usage tracking.

Possible disadvantages of Stacktape

  • Limited Provider Support
    As of now, Stacktape may primarily focus on certain cloud providers like AWS, limiting flexibility for organizations using multiple or alternative clouds.
  • Learning Curve
    For teams unfamiliar with infrastructure as code or new to Stacktape, there might be an initial learning curve to fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Pricing Concerns
    The pricing model could be a concern for some users depending on their budget and requirements, especially if they need extended features or higher tiers.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku CI and Stacktape)
Developer Tools
53 53%
47% 47
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Deployment
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku CI and Stacktape. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Stacktape seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 33 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku CI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Heroku CI yet. Tracking of Heroku CI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Stacktape mentions (33)

  • Coolify: Open-source and self-hostable Heroku / Netlify / Vercel alternative
    I'm sorry for being a bit off-topic, but I'm a founder of a PaaS company myself, and I think that what we offer is a great alternative to Coolify for companies that need a more "managed" and reliable infra. https://stacktape.com is a Heroku/Vercel-like PaaS platform that deploys directly to your own AWS account. It supports both serverless (lambda functions), and serverful (AWS ECS Fargate or EC2) deployments.... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Ask HN: Do you know of any deployment mangement front ends?
    Hello, You can also have a look at https://stacktape.com (full disclosure: I'm a founder). It's a Heroku-like PaaS that deploys to your own AWS account. We support both serverless and container-based workloads (Fargate and EC2), and many AWS infrastructure (RDS, Aurora, MongoDb, Redis, OpenSearch - ElasticSearch, Bastion servers, etc.). We're IaC-first but also provide a UI for. We can do a hans-on assistance with... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Render raises $80M in Series C financing
    Shameless plug: at https://stacktape.com, we also do "Heroku-like PaaS experience" built on top of AWS. But we deploy directly to our user's AWS account. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Reclaim the Stack
    Since DHH has been promoting the 'do-it-yourself' approach, many people have fallen for it. You're asking the right questions that only a few people know they need answers to. In my opinion, the closest thing to "reclaiming the stack" while still being a PaaS is to use a "deploy to your cloud account" PaaS provider. These services offer the convenience of a PaaS provider, yet allow you to "eject" to using the... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Tau: Open-source PaaS – A self-hosted Vercel / Netlify / Cloudflare alternative
    > Isn't the entire point of vercel/netlify/cloudflare is that you don't have to self-host? The issue is the price of it, not the actual software. There's also a third way, which we're trying to do at stacktape[1]. We've built a PaaS platform on top of AWS, running in your own account. So you get all of the stability, flexibility and reliability of AWS, yet the deployment process is easy as using something... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku CI and Stacktape, you can also consider the following products

Nevercode - Continuous integration & delivery for mobile apps made easy. Build, test & release native & cross-platform apps faster with Nevercode. Sign up for free.

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Northflank - The comprehensive developer platform to build and scale microservices, jobs and managed databases with a powerful UI, API & CLI.

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.

Render - Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.