Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Heroku CI VS Cimon by Cycode

Compare Heroku CI VS Cimon by Cycode and see what are their differences

Heroku CI logo Heroku CI

Continuous Integration from Heroku

Cimon by Cycode logo Cimon by Cycode

Runtime Security Solution for CI/CD Pipelines
  • Heroku CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • Cimon by Cycode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-12

Heroku CI features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Heroku CI is tightly integrated with Heroku Pipelines, making it easy to deploy successfully tested builds directly into different stages, streamlining the deployment process.
  • Easy Setup
    Heroku CI provides a straightforward setup process, particularly for existing Heroku applications. This makes it accessible for teams who are already using Heroku for their application hosting.
  • Ephemeral Test Environments
    Heroku CI automatically provisions and tears down application environments for tests, ensuring a clean state for each test run and reducing the likelihood of false positives/negatives caused by environment differences.
  • Built-in Support for Multiple Languages
    Offers native support for a variety of programming languages supported by Heroku, allowing diverse teams to implement CI processes without additional configuration.
  • Parallel Test Execution
    Enables parallel execution of test suites, which can significantly reduce overall testing time and speed up the development and deployment cycles.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku CI

  • Cost
    Heroku CI can be expensive for teams or projects that require many CI environments or frequent builds, as it operates on Heroku's dyno cost model.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to more robust CI/CD tools, Heroku CI offers less flexibility and customization options, which might be restrictive for complex build processes or unique testing requirements.
  • Integration Limitations
    While Heroku CI integrates well with Heroku Pipelines, it may not offer the same level of integration or support for other popular CI/CD tools and services, potentially complicating mixed-environment setups.
  • Performance Limitations
    The performance of the CI process is tied to the dyno types utilized in Heroku, and can be limited by the dyno configurations, impacting the speed and efficiency of running tests.
  • Dependency on Heroku Ecosystem
    Heroku CI is primarily beneficial if you are already using Heroku for deployment, which may not be suitable for teams relying on different cloud providers or those seeking vendor independence.

Cimon by Cycode features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku CI and Cimon by Cycode)
Developer Tools
74 74%
26% 26
Continuous Integration
76 76%
24% 24
Continuous Deployment
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku CI and Cimon by Cycode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku CI and Cimon by Cycode, you can also consider the following products

Nevercode - Continuous integration & delivery for mobile apps made easy. Build, test & release native & cross-platform apps faster with Nevercode. Sign up for free.

Cicada.build - Build CI/CD pipelines in TypeScript and run them anywhere.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

SaaS Starter Kit - A starter template with Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD and more

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.

R2Devops Hub - Create powerful CI/CD pipelines, easily