Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Heartface VS Webpacker

Compare Heartface VS Webpacker and see what are their differences

Heartface logo Heartface

One-click checkout for anything, sold by anyone, everywhere.

Webpacker logo Webpacker

Use Webpack to manage app-like JavaScript modules in Rails - rails/webpacker
  • Heartface Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-01-06
  • Webpacker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

Heartface videos

No Heartface videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Webpacker videos

RailsConf 2020 CE - Webpacker, It-Just-Works, But How? by Justin Gordon

More videos:

  • Review - Should you use React with Webpacker in your Rails project? Rails MVC vs Single Page App (SPA)!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heartface and Webpacker)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Heartface and Webpacker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpacker seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heartface mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Heartface yet. Tracking of Heartface recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Webpacker mentions (17)

  • React + Ruby on Rails without any gems
    We will use Webpacker or JavaScript compiler and assets management. By following the webpacker installation guide, let’s add Webpacker and React to our application. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Collecting JavaScript code coverage with Capybara in Ruby on Rails application
    For example, there is a Ruby on Rails application that uses Webpacker and has JavaScript files that are covered by the system tests. Capybara is used as the system testing tool. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Asset Pipeline JS Migration
    Using Webpacker in Rails provides several advantages over the traditional asset pipeline. First, Webpacker uses JavaScript modules, which allows for better code organization and improved code reusability. Second, it offers modern frontend build tools, such as Babel and PostCSS, for transforming and compiling assets. Third, it provides faster build times and faster runtime performance through code splitting and... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Thank you Webpacker, Goodbye Webpacker
    This article is replace Webpacker with Simpacker and webpack. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • How to setup ruby on rails + Angular
    In ruby ​​on rails 7 what is the best way to properly install Angular because I can't find any documentation about it. The only tutorial that exists uses webpacker (https://github.com/rails/webpacker) but unfortunately it is no longer supported and no longer up to date in terms of security. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heartface and Webpacker, you can also consider the following products

Xpresslane - Universal one click checkout for shopping on the internet

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Dola - A digital wallet and 1-click checkout

Pingy CLI - Making Modern Websites Should Be Easier. Pingy is Here To Help.

Superplate - The frontend boilerplate with superpowers

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.