Software Alternatives & Reviews

Haskell VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare Haskell VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Haskell logo Haskell

An advanced purely-functional programming language

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
  • Haskell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-01

We recommend LibHunt Haskell for discovery and comparisons of trending Haskell projects.

  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

Haskell videos

Functional Programming & Haskell - Computerphile

More videos:

  • Review - Marloe Haskell Review
  • Review - Marloe Watch Company - Haskell - Watch Review

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Haskell and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
Programming Language
69 69%
31% 31
OOP
68 68%
32% 32
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Haskell and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Haskell should be more popular than Steel Bank Common Lisp. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Haskell mentions (21)

  • Is there a programming language that will blow my mind?
    Haskell - a general-purpose functional language with many unique properties (purely functional, lazy, expressive types, STM, etc). You mentioned you dabbled in Haskell, why not try it again? (I've written about 7 things I learned from Haskell, and my book is linked at them bottom if you're interested :) ). Source: 11 months ago
  • Where to go from here?
    Where you go is entirely up to you. According to haskell.org, Haskell jobs are a-plenty. sigh. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Haskell.org now has "Get Started" page!
    Should they be part of haskell.org or something else? Source: about 1 year ago
  • Haskell.org now has "Get Started" page!
    Haskell.org now has a big purple Get Started button that takes you to a nice short guide (haskell.org/get-started) that quickly provides all the basic info to get going with Haskell. It is aimed for beginners, to reduce choice fatigue and to give them a clear, official path to get going. Source: about 1 year ago
  • dev environment for windows
    I just jumped into the wiki "Write Yourself a Scheme in 48 hours" which looks pretty good. (although some of the text explanation is hard to understand without context).. I used cabal to set up the starter project. Sublime editor seems to work OK and I just use the git Bash shell on windows to compile the program directly on the command line. So maybe this is all good enough for now (?). It seems installing... Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 12 months ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Haskell and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.