Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Harp VS Hugo

Compare Harp VS Hugo and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Harp logo Harp

The static web server with built-in preprocessing.

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
  • Harp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-10
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

Harp videos

+ Add

Harp Review - 10 harps from 50$ to 15.000$ - comparison guide

More videos:

  • Review - Westside Discs Harp Review and Giveaway! | Danny Lindahl
  • Review - Dusty Strings Harp Review

Hugo videos

+ Add

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Harp and Hugo)

Harp

Hugo

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
Blogging
100% 100
CMS
4 4%
CMS
96% 96
Static Site Generators
0 0%
Static Site Generators
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Harp and Hugo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Harp and Hugo

Harp Reviews

We have no reviews of Harp yet.
Be the first one to post

Hugo Reviews

10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com
Hugo or Jekyll? 6 Factors You Should Know
Hugo is blazingly fast. We previously released a post on the performance of Hugo and Jekyll and compared the two. Hugo was the clear winner.
Source: forestry.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than Harp. While we know about 354 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 1 mention of Harp. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Harp mentions (1)

  • Is there a technology for reusing HTML components?
    Sounds like what you want is a static site generator. I've used Harp for a long time but I'm not sure it's really maintained these days, so you might also look at 11ty. Source: over 1 year ago

Hugo mentions (354)

  • Building static websites
    At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Creating excerpts in Astro
    This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
    We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation
    In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 5 Open-Source Documentation Development Platforms of 2024
    Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Harp and Hugo, you can also consider the following products

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Metalsmith - An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Loading...