No Hammer.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than Hammer.js. While we know about 999 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Hammer.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Actually, I thought if I used hammerjs, it would be easy, but actually I gave up using that since it seemed that hammerjs's development wasn't active any more unfortunately. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Looking at https://delassus.com/javascripts/app.js you can see they used hammer.js(https://hammerjs.github.io/) to achieve the gestures, which I am assuming is your focus here. Source: over 2 years ago
Hammer.js is a library and gives you the ability to add touch gestures on websites. It means it can recognize & track gestures performed by the fingers and mouse of the user and make animations and all that cool stuff. And you can know the steps on their website here. Source: almost 3 years ago
I had no idea how bad listening for things like key presses and dragging events are today. Given how nice and fairly standard a lot of the APIs across browsers and platforms have become, I was shocked at how rough this space is. I think if I had to do this again, this will be one area where I defer to a library (like hammer.js). - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Maybe something using HammerJS would make it cleaner if you're using a vanilla solution right now? https://hammerjs.github.io/. Source: about 3 years ago
A few may know, that google scholar(https://scholar.google.com/) does not offer a feature for arranging the search results based on the number of citations. Several years ago, one developer published a Python code (https://github.com/WittmannF/sort-google-scholar) to handle this. I had been inspired by his work, but I wanted to show the list of... - Source: Hacker News / 16 days ago
To that point, https://scholar.google.com/ is still useful. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
1) find the doi number [1a][1b] 2) find sources that cite the doi number -> google scholar[2][3] 3) filter for 'github' ----- [1a]resolve a doi name : https://dx.doi.org/ [1b]find a doi number : https://answers.lib.iup.edu/faq/31945 [2] : https://scholar.google.com/ [3] : google with "site:http://doi.org/" [4] : finding a doi in document page :... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Half of those are about science, during my Ph.D., I was told to use scholar.google.com, which works great as far as I can tell. Couple it to sci-hub and you get all the scientific literature you need. Source: 5 months ago
Scholar.google.com exists also which is what you use for studies. Source: 5 months ago
gesture.ai - Easy to use gesture recognition technology and SDK
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
360° media - 360 Media is a boutique public relations, digital marketing and event-planning agency in Atlanta specializing in lifestyle, entertainment and hospitality.
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Leap Motion - Reach into the future of virtual and augmented reality with the most advanced hand tracking on Earth, used by over 300,000 developers worldwide.
Forge - Static web hosting made simple