Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Haml VS Foundation

Compare Haml VS Foundation and see what are their differences

Kimp
Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Haml logo Haml

HTML Abstraction Markup Language - A Markup Haiku

Foundation logo Foundation

The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world
  • Haml Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • Foundation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-20

Haml features and specs

  • Readability
    Haml syntax is designed to be clean and indentation-based, which can lead to more readable code compared to standard HTML, especially in complex projects.
  • DRY Principle
    Haml encourages the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle by minimizing the need for closing tags and emphasizing reusable code snippets, reducing redundancy.
  • Embedded Ruby
    Haml allows seamless embedding of Ruby code, making it a powerful tool for developers working in Ruby environments, as logic and view are more closely intertwined.
  • Whitespace Sensitivity
    The indentation-based syntax reduces clutter by removing the need for explicit closing tags, curly braces, and other traditional HTML structure elements.
  • Maintaining Consistency
    The enforced indentation and structure positively guide developers towards structured and consistent code, which can be enforced across a team.

Possible disadvantages of Haml

  • Learning Curve
    Developers accustomed to traditional HTML might face a learning curve when first encountering Haml, due to its unique syntax and whitespace significance.
  • Whitespace Sensitivity
    The reliance on indentation and whitespace for code structure can lead to frustrating errors if the code is not indented correctly, causing potential debugging challenges.
  • Tooling and Support
    Haml might not be as widely supported by various IDEs and text editors compared to standard HTML or other templating languages, potentially hindering productivity.
  • Performance Overhead
    When rendering Haml templates, there might be a slight performance hit due to the processing needed to convert Haml into HTML.
  • Limited Adoption
    Haml is not as widespread as other templating languages, which might lead to fewer community resources, libraries, or plugins compared to more popular alternatives.

Foundation features and specs

  • Customizability
    Foundation offers a high level of customizability, allowing developers to adjust the framework to meet specific project requirements.
  • Responsive Design
    Foundation is built with mobile-first design principles, ensuring that applications look and function well on a variety of devices and screen sizes.
  • Semantic Code
    The framework encourages the use of semantic HTML, making code more readable and improving accessibility.
  • Range of Components
    Foundation provides a wide array of pre-built components such as buttons, forms, and navigation bars, which can accelerate development time.
  • Strong Community Support
    The Foundation community is active and provides extensive documentation, forums, and additional resources to help developers.
  • Flex Grid
    Foundation's Flex Grid system provides a powerful and flexible way to create responsive layouts that adapt to different screen sizes.

Possible disadvantages of Foundation

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customizability, Foundation can have a steep learning curve for beginners.
  • Size
    The full-featured version of Foundation can be quite large, potentially slowing down load times if not optimized properly.
  • Browser Compatibility Issues
    While generally robust, Foundation has been known to have occasional compatibility issues with certain browsers, necessitating additional fixes.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Foundation relies on jQuery for several of its components, which can be seen as outdated or unnecessary by some modern developers.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For smaller projects, Foundation might be overkill in terms of features and setup, making simpler frameworks or no framework a more optimal choice.

Analysis of Foundation

Overall verdict

  • Foundation is a good choice for artists looking to enter the NFT space, offering opportunities for both emerging and established creators to reach a wider audience. The emphasis on curation and community engagement can be beneficial for those seeking recognition and growth in the digital art world.

Why this product is good

  • Foundation (get.foundation) is considered a reputable platform for digital creators and artists to showcase and sell their work as NFTs. It provides a clean and user-friendly interface, emphasizes high-quality art and design, and fosters a community of collectors and creators. The platform is built on the Ethereum blockchain, ensuring secure and transparent transactions.

Recommended for

  • Digital artists
  • NFT collectors
  • Art enthusiasts
  • Creatives looking to monetize their work

Haml videos

+ Add

How to Get Baby in Urdu&Hindi | Hamal Check krny ka Treeka | Haml Ghar Ma Chk Krain | Get B In Urdu

Foundation videos

+ Add

BEST & WORST NEW FOUNDATIONS

More videos:

  • Review - BEST & WORST NEW FOUNDATIONS
  • Review - BEST & WORST FOUNDATIONS | Luxury & Drugstore

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Haml and Foundation)

Haml

Foundation

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
CSS Framework
0 0%
CSS Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Haml and Foundation. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Haml and Foundation

Haml Reviews

We have no reviews of Haml yet.
Be the first one to post

Foundation Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
The reason I picked Foundation for this list is its strong emphasis on creating responsive designs, a feature that many developers value in the era of mobile browsing. This framework differentiates itself with an ingrained mobile-first approach, ensuring that applications look great on smaller screens without sacrificing functionality or aesthetics on larger ones.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Semantic, coherent, and fully customizable, the Foundation empowers developers to create designs that are not only visually appealing but also adaptable to various screen sizes. Starting with small devices, developers can gradually enhance the complexity of their designs, ensuring a fully responsive experience layer by layer.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Not only this, but they also have ‘Foundation for Emails’, which is a framework to code responsive HTML emails. Hence, whenever you are looking for an alternative to Bootstrap, do give Foundation a try.
Source: hackr.io
11 Best Material UI Alternatives
Foundation is a responsive front-end framework with CSS and JavaScript components for building modern, mobile-friendly websites. It offers a comprehensive toolkit with a modular approach, allowing developers to customize and tailor their designs to meet specific project requirements.
Source: www.uxpin.com
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
One of the most advanced and sophisticated UI frameworks, Foundation enables quick website development. Just like Bootstrap, Foundation follows a mobile-first approach and is fully responsive. It is very suitable for huge web applications that need a lot of styling. Foundation is customizable, flexible, and semantic. And, there are over 2k contributors on Github and decent...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Foundation might be a bit more popular than Haml. We know about 21 links to it since March 2021 and only 19 links to Haml. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Haml mentions (19)

  • Douglas Hofstadter on Lisp (1983)
    I never suggested that I was the first person to think of this; not having dealt with any Lisp since (hmmm) 1990 via Scheme in my introductory CS 212 class at Cornell probably has something to do with my ignorance of the prior art in this area. I do like your approach of breadcrumbing me instead of giving me the answer, though... Best I can guess is "tooling" and simply that S-expressions are simply too embedded... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • A RuboCop Configuration Tailored for Phlex
    Phlex takes a more Ruby-centric approach to generating HTML by using Ruby classes and methods instead of traditional template files like ERB or HAML. While this is great for reusability and code organization (And writing more Ruby 🤩), it can lead to long methods and classes, especially when building complex components or pages. Adding TailwindCSS into the mix further increases line lengths because of its... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Building a syntax highlighting extension for VS Code
    First of all, I like Slim. I like the beauty and cleanness of Slim templates, to me they are way more readable than regular ERB templates and I think they fit in the ruby/Rails ecosystem very well. Slim is a close cousin to Haml, without the ugly percent characters, haha. I've used Slim exclusively in my projects since about 2016. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
    > I can't say what problem it is supposed to solve "Haml accelerates and simplifies template creation" https://haml.info/ If you'd rather write raw HTML, keeping track of closing tags etc, then don't use HAML. No need to bash it because you personally feel it is ugly or unnecessary. FWIW I personally feel the exact opposite. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
    There is a better side by side of the syntax here https://haml.info (i've been using haml for 17 years lol, I find it more enjoyable to read and write). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Foundation mentions (21)

  • Blazor #3 - How to Install Foundation into a Blazor Project
    Foundation is a mobile-first responsive front-end framework that provides a range of CSS and JavaScript components for creating websites quickly. It’s often seen as a competitor to Bootstrap, offering more flexibility and customization options. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Foundation: An easy-to-use, powerful, and flexible front-end framework for building web applications on any device. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Show HN: LangCSS – An AI Assistant for Tailwind
    Here is a thought you might want to consider and see if it makes sense. This is personal, but I also believe this is where design codes (especially CSS) are going to go. It is not going to be Tailwind or more new frameworks. Honestly, I think all of these Bootstrap, Foundation, and Tailwind, etc. Are like middle-layer abstractions are for designs that are neither small nor large. Bootstrap won because of the... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Front-end Framework: Comparing Bootstrap, Foundation and Materialize
    Foundation is another popular open-source front-end framework, similar to Bootstrap, but with its own set of features and design principles. It was created by ZURB a design and development company in 2011. And is also maintained by a community of developers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • I hate CSS: how can I build UIs?
    Are you cool with JS frameworks? If so, you can use a higher level of abstraction that takes care of the CSS for you. If you just want to mock something up, you can use a pre-built UI system / component framework and just put together UIs declaratively, without having to worry about the underlying CSS or HTML at all. Examples include https://mui.com/ and https://chakra-ui.com/ and https://ant.design/ Really easy... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Haml and Foundation, you can also consider the following products

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Pug - Pug is a robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for Node.js

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Fortitude - Views Are Code: use all the power of Ruby to build views in your own language. - ageweke/fortitude

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

Loading...