Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

gRPC VS JSONing API

Compare gRPC VS JSONing API and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

gRPC logo gRPC

Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

JSONing API logo JSONing API

Free and open-source mock API for testing and prototyping. Easily create a mock API from JSON data, with the ability to define custom rules for HTTP status codes, headers, and response bodies.
  • gRPC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-05-27
  • JSONing API
    Image date //
    2024-10-02

gRPC features and specs

  • Performance
    gRPC uses Protocol Buffers, which are more efficient in terms of serialization and deserialization compared to text-based formats like JSON. This leads to lower CPU usage and faster transmission, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
  • Bi-directional Streaming
    gRPC supports bi-directional streaming, enabling both client and server to send a series of messages through a single connection. This is particularly useful for real-time communication applications.
  • Strongly Typed APIs
    gRPC uses Protocol Buffers for defining service methods and message types, providing a strong type system that can catch potential issues at compile-time rather than runtime.
  • Cross-language Support
    gRPC supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to Java, C++, Python, Go, and C#. This allows for flexible integration in polyglot environments.
  • Built-in Deadlines/Timeouts
    gRPC natively supports deadlines and timeouts to help manage long-running calls and avoid indefinite blocking, improving robustness and reliability.
  • Automatic Code Generation
    gRPC provides tools for automatic code generation from .proto files, reducing boilerplate code and speeding up the development process.

Possible disadvantages of gRPC

  • Learning Curve
    The complexity of gRPC and Protocol Buffers may present a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with these technologies.
  • Limited Browser Support
    gRPC was not originally designed with browser support in mind, making it challenging to directly call gRPC services from web applications without additional tools like gRPC-Web.
  • Verbose Configuration
    Setting up gRPC and defining .proto files can be more verbose compared to simpler RESTful APIs, which might be a deterrent for smaller projects.
  • HTTP/2 Requirement
    gRPC relies on HTTP/2 for transport, which can be problematic in environments where HTTP/2 is not supported or requires additional configuration.
  • Limited Monitoring and Debugging Tools
    Compared to REST, there are fewer tools available for monitoring, debugging, and testing gRPC services, which might complicate troubleshooting and performance tuning.
  • Protobuf Ecosystem Requirement
    Depending on the language, integrating Protocol Buffers might require additional dependencies and tooling, which could add to the maintenance overhead.

JSONing API features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

gRPC videos

+ Add

gRPC, Protobufs and Go... OH MY! An introduction to building client/server systems with gRPC

More videos:

  • Review - gRPC with Mark Rendle
  • Review - GraphQL, gRPC or REST? Resolving the API Developer's Dilemma - Rob Crowley - NDC Oslo 2020
  • Review - Taking Full Advantage of gRPC
  • Review - gRPC Web: It’s All About Communication by Alex Borysov & Yevgen Golubenko
  • Review - tRPC, gRPC, GraphQL or REST: when to use what?

JSONing API videos

No JSONing API videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to gRPC and JSONing API)

gRPC

JSONing API

Web Servers
100 100%
Web Servers
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100
Developer Tools
86 86%
Developer Tools
14% 14
Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using gRPC and JSONing API. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare gRPC and JSONing API

gRPC Reviews

SignalR Alternatives
SignalR is basically used to allow connection between client and server or vice-versa. It is a type of bi-directional communication between both the client and server. SignalR is compatible with web sockets and many other connections, which help in the direct push of content over the server. There are many alternatives for signalR that are used, like Firebase, pusher,...
Source: www.educba.com

JSONing API Reviews

We have no reviews of JSONing API yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, gRPC seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 96 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

gRPC mentions (96)

  • Getting Started With gRPC in Golang
    gRPC is a framework for building fast, scalable APIs, especially in distributed systems like microservices. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Should You Ditch REST for gRPC?
    Recently, I started working on extending the support for gRPC in GoFr, a microservices oriented, Golang framework also listed in CNCF Landscape. As I was diving into this, I thought it would be a great opportunity to share my findings through a detailed article. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Unlocking DuckDB from Anywhere - A Guide to Remote Access with Apache Arrow and Flight RPC (gRPC)
    Apache Arrow Flight RPC : Arrow Flight is an RPC framework for high-performance data services based on Arrow data, and is built on top of gRPC and the IPC format. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • JSON vs FlatBuffers vs Protocol Buffers
    Generally used in conjunction with gRPC (but not necessarily), Protobuf is a binary protocol that significantly increases performance compared to the text format of JSON. But it "suffers" from the same problem as JSON: we need to parse it to a data structure of our language. For example, in Go:. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Performance and Scalability for Database-Backed Applications
    We can take the previously mentioned idea of partitioning the database further by breaking up an application into multiple applications, each with its own database. In this case each application will communicate with the others via something like REST, RPC (e.g. gRPC), or a message queue (e.g. Redis, Kafka, or RabbitMQ). - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

JSONing API mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JSONing API yet. Tracking of JSONing API recommendations started around Oct 2024.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing gRPC and JSONing API, you can also consider the following products

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

JSON Placeholder - JSON Placeholder is a modern platform that provides you online REST API, which you can instantly use whenever you need any fake data.

GraphQL - GraphQL is a data query language and runtime to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps.

Mockae - The most flexible way to mock REST APIs with Lua code execution

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

Protobuf - Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.

Loading...