Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GraphQL Playground VS WebComponents.dev

Compare GraphQL Playground VS WebComponents.dev and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GraphQL Playground logo GraphQL Playground

GraphQL IDE for better development workflows

WebComponents.dev logo WebComponents.dev

The modern IDE for web platform developers
  • GraphQL Playground Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • WebComponents.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-11

GraphQL Playground features and specs

  • Interactive Interface
    GraphQL Playground provides a user-friendly, interactive interface for exploring and testing GraphQL queries and mutations. This allows developers to quickly experiment with their GraphQL API.
  • Auto-Completion and Syntax Highlighting
    It offers auto-completion and syntax highlighting which increases productivity by helping developers write correct GraphQL queries faster.
  • Built-in Documentation
    The built-in documentation explorer helps developers easily navigate and understand the GraphQL schemas, types, and fields available in their API.
  • Real-time Error Feedback
    Provides real-time error feedback, making it easier to identify and fix issues while writing queries, resulting in smoother development workflows.
  • Request History
    GraphQL Playground maintains a history of queries and mutations executed, allowing developers to quickly revisit and reuse previous work.
  • Customizable Settings
    It is highly customizable, allowing developers to set endpoint URLs, headers, and other configurations to match various environments (development, staging, production).

Possible disadvantages of GraphQL Playground

  • Performance
    GraphQL Playground can be resource-intensive, consuming significant amounts of memory and CPU, which might slow down the development environment, especially with large schemas.
  • Security Concerns
    As an interactive playground embedded in web interfaces, it may expose sensitive data or operations if not properly secured, necessitating careful configuration and access control.
  • Limited Offline Use
    Since it relies on an active endpoint to fetch schema details and execute queries, its utility is limited when working offline.
  • Deprecated Maintenance
    As of 2020, the GraphQL Playground repository is not actively maintained anymore, which means it may not receive updates, bug fixes, or new features.
  • Complex Configuration
    In comparison to simpler alternatives, setting up and configuring GraphQL Playground can be more complex and time-consuming.

WebComponents.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WebComponents.dev provides a streamlined platform to create, share, and experiment with web components without needing extensive configuration or setup. This lowers the barrier to entry for both new and experienced developers.
  • Component Library
    The platform includes a rich library of pre-built components and templates, enabling developers to quickly find and integrate components into their projects.
  • Collaborative Environment
    WebComponents.dev supports collaboration by allowing developers to share their components with others easily. This fosters community engagement and learning opportunities.
  • Integration with Popular Frameworks
    It supports integration with popular frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, making it versatile and useful for developers working across different ecosystems.

Possible disadvantages of WebComponents.dev

  • Limited Customization
    While WebComponents.dev offers many features for component development and sharing, the platform’s environment might limit some advanced customization possibilities compared to traditional development setups.
  • Dependence on the Platform
    Projects heavily reliant on WebComponents.dev might face challenges if the platform experiences downtime or significant changes, as they are dependent on a third-party service for their development workflow.
  • Performance Overhead
    Developing and running components within a browser-based IDE might introduce performance overheads not present in local development environments.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    While designed to be user-friendly, there might be a learning curve for developers unfamiliar with web components or the specific paradigms of WebComponents.dev.

GraphQL Playground videos

Graphql playground review completa parte 1

More videos:

  • Review - Create Local GraphQL Playground
  • Review - Graphql playground review completa parte 2

WebComponents.dev videos

No WebComponents.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GraphQL Playground and WebComponents.dev)
Developer Tools
64 64%
36% 36
GraphQL
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Realtime Backend / API
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GraphQL Playground and WebComponents.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

GraphQL Playground might be a bit more popular than WebComponents.dev. We know about 12 links to it since March 2021 and only 9 links to WebComponents.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GraphQL Playground mentions (12)

  • Show HN: API Parrot – Automatically Reverse Engineer HTTP APIs"
    Have you tried something like GraphQL playground before? https://github.com/graphql/graphql-playground There's other tools out there that can generate similar docs or playgrounds, given you have a schema/spec of some type. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Exploring GraphiQL 2 Updates and New Features
    GraphiQL is a tool that was created to help developers explore GraphQL APIs, maintained by the GraphQL Foundation. But when GraphiQL became more and more popular, developers started to create additional GraphQL IDEs. A good example of this was GraphQL Playground, which quickly became the most popular GraphQL IDE. It was loosely based on GraphiQL, but had more features and a better UI. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Why Is It So Important To Go To Meetups
    I went to a GraphQL meetup and they used the gql playground and a similar schema generator to what I was using, and it made me feel relevant. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • GraphQL subscriptions at scale with NATS
    Here, we'll create a simple GraphQL server and subscribe to a subject from our resolver. We'll use GraphQL playground to mock client side behavior. Once we're connected we'll use NATS CLI to send a payload to our subject and see the changes on the client. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • GraphQL vs REST in .NET Core
    Now we can consume created GraphQL API. In the GitHub Repo same functionality has been added with REST approach and GraphQL endpoint. Also widely used Swagger configured for Web API Endpoints as well as AltairUI added for GraphQL endpoint testing. Naturally, AltairUI it not a must for GraphQL, you can also use Swagger, GraphiQL, or GraphQL Playground. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
View more

WebComponents.dev mentions (9)

  • Painless Web Components: Naming is (not too) Hard
    How the tag name gets into your code can vary based on the method you are using to write your components. If you load up a few of the templates over on WebComponents.dev you'll see that many examples just use a string value typed into the define function directly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • free-for.dev
    WebComponents.dev — In-browser IDE to code web components in isolation with 58 templates available, supporting stories and tests. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Why Atomico js webcomponents?
    We will show the benefits of Atomico through a comparison, we have used as a basis for this comparison the existing counter webcomponents in webcomponents.dev of Atomico, Lit, Preact and React as a base. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Javascript animation in LWC, tried Motion one
    Unfortunately, I couldn't get this to work in the online LWC editor https://webcomponents.dev So assuming this also won't work in the shadow DOM enviroment of SF? Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Cute Solar System with CSS
    WebComponentsDev have a lot of libraries and info (like codesandbox, but webcomponents land): Https://webcomponents.dev/. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GraphQL Playground and WebComponents.dev, you can also consider the following products

How to GraphQL - Open-source tutorial website to learn GraphQL development

Arbiter IDE - The offline-friendly, in-browser IDE for pure JS prototypes

GraphQl Editor - Editor for GraphQL that lets you draw GraphQL schemas using visual nodes

Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps

Stellate.co - Everything you need to run your GraphQL API at scale

CodeOnline - A remote and secure workspace powered by VSCode