Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Graphical HTTP Client VS Hurl.it

Compare Graphical HTTP Client VS Hurl.it and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Graphical HTTP Client logo Graphical HTTP Client

Graphical Http Client is a utility to help you test and interact with REST-based web services.

Hurl.it logo Hurl.it

Hurl makes HTTP requests.
  • Graphical HTTP Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07
  • Hurl.it Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05

Graphical HTTP Client features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The Graphical HTTP Client offers a graphical interface that is intuitive for users, making it straightforward to visualize and construct HTTP requests without needing deep coding expertise.
  • Ease of Use
    Designed to simplify the process of making HTTP requests, it provides users with an accessible way to interact with web services and APIs.
  • Visualization
    Offers visual tools for monitoring and analyzing request/response cycles, making it easier to debug and understand API interactions.
  • Rapid Testing
    Allows users to quickly test API endpoints and integrations, saving time compared to traditional methods that might require manual scripting.

Possible disadvantages of Graphical HTTP Client

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Might lack some of the advanced features and flexibility of command-line or script-based HTTP clients, which could be necessary for complex tasks.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Users new to the concept of HTTP clients might still face a learning curve in understanding how to properly construct and utilize HTTP requests effectively.
  • Dependency on GUI
    Being a graphical tool, it may not offer the same level of automation and scripting capabilities as CLI-based tools, limiting its use in automated workflows.
  • Resource Intensity
    Graphical applications can consume more system resources compared to text-based alternatives, potentially making them less suitable for resource-constrained environments.

Hurl.it features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Graphical HTTP Client and Hurl.it)

Graphical HTTP Client

Hurl.it

Developer Tools
44 44%
Developer Tools
56% 56
API Tools
44 44%
API Tools
56% 56
APIs
46 46%
APIs
54% 54
Command Line Tools
40 40%
Command Line Tools
60% 60

User comments

Share your experience with using Graphical HTTP Client and Hurl.it. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hurl.it seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Graphical HTTP Client mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Graphical HTTP Client yet. Tracking of Graphical HTTP Client recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Hurl.it mentions (3)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Graphical HTTP Client and Hurl.it, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Cocoa Rest Client - A free open source, native Apple OS X app for testing HTTP/REST endpoints

RESTClient - RESTClient can be used to test variety of HTTP communications and RESTful webservices.

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

Firefox Developer Tools - Examine, edit, and debug HTML, CSS, and JavaScript on the desktop and on mobile.

Google Chrome Developer Tools - Get started with Google Chrome's built-in web developer tools.

Loading...