Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Graphical HTTP Client VS Advanced REST Client (ARC)

Compare Graphical HTTP Client VS Advanced REST Client (ARC) and see what are their differences

Graphical HTTP Client logo Graphical HTTP Client

Graphical Http Client is a utility to help you test and interact with REST-based web services.

Advanced REST Client (ARC) logo Advanced REST Client (ARC)

API testing tool. Which allows web developers to create and test custom HTTP requests.
  • Graphical HTTP Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07
  • Advanced REST Client (ARC) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-11

Graphical HTTP Client features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The Graphical HTTP Client offers a graphical interface that is intuitive for users, making it straightforward to visualize and construct HTTP requests without needing deep coding expertise.
  • Ease of Use
    Designed to simplify the process of making HTTP requests, it provides users with an accessible way to interact with web services and APIs.
  • Visualization
    Offers visual tools for monitoring and analyzing request/response cycles, making it easier to debug and understand API interactions.
  • Rapid Testing
    Allows users to quickly test API endpoints and integrations, saving time compared to traditional methods that might require manual scripting.

Possible disadvantages of Graphical HTTP Client

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Might lack some of the advanced features and flexibility of command-line or script-based HTTP clients, which could be necessary for complex tasks.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Users new to the concept of HTTP clients might still face a learning curve in understanding how to properly construct and utilize HTTP requests effectively.
  • Dependency on GUI
    Being a graphical tool, it may not offer the same level of automation and scripting capabilities as CLI-based tools, limiting its use in automated workflows.
  • Resource Intensity
    Graphical applications can consume more system resources compared to text-based alternatives, potentially making them less suitable for resource-constrained environments.

Advanced REST Client (ARC) features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    ARC provides a clean and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and create HTTP requests without a steep learning curve.
  • Support for Various Protocols
    ARC supports multiple protocols including HTTP, WebSocket, and HTTP/2, allowing developers to test a wide range of APIs and services.
  • Customizable
    ARC allows users to customize headers, parameters, and authentication methods, providing flexibility to meet a variety of testing scenarios.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The application is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring accessibility for a broader developer audience.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, ARC allows users to contribute to its development, ensuring continuous improvement and adaptation to new needs.

Possible disadvantages of Advanced REST Client (ARC)

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to other tools like Postman, ARC lacks some advanced features, such as automated testing and more comprehensive collaboration options.
  • Stability Issues
    Some users report occasional stability and performance issues, particularly with larger requests or when handling extensive data sets.
  • Learning Curve for Beginners
    While the interface is user-friendly, beginners might find the initial setup and understanding of REST concepts challenging without proper guidance.
  • Community Support
    Although ARC is open-source, it has a smaller user community than some competitors, which may affect the speed and quality of available support and resources.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Graphical HTTP Client and Advanced REST Client (ARC))
Developer Tools
34 34%
66% 66
API Tools
31 31%
69% 69
APIs
48 48%
52% 52
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Graphical HTTP Client and Advanced REST Client (ARC). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Advanced REST Client (ARC) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Graphical HTTP Client mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Graphical HTTP Client yet. Tracking of Graphical HTTP Client recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Advanced REST Client (ARC) mentions (1)

  • Tell HN: Postman just wiped all my stuff
    I been using 'Advanced Rest Client' (ARC) https://install.advancedrestclient.com/ No accounts required, offline, open source, A little bloated using electron but its multiplatform and a desktop client. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Graphical HTTP Client and Advanced REST Client (ARC), you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

API Fortress - API performance, accuracy, and uptime testing. Without code.

Hurl.it - Hurl makes HTTP requests.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

RESTClient - RESTClient can be used to test variety of HTTP communications and RESTful webservices.

HttpMaster - HttpMaster is a professional software tool for testing and debugging HTTP applications, primarily aimed at REST API applications and web services.