Google Play Books VS DocDroid

Compare Google Play Books VS DocDroid and see what are their differences

Img.vision

Image hosting & video hosting for eCommerce sellers featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Google Play Books

Google Play Books lets you search, preview, and buy millions of books using Google Book Search.

DocDroid

DocDroid is a service for sharing document and slides.

Landing page //
2018-10-10

Landing page //
2021-07-29

Google Play Books Review | Is Publishing on Google Play Worth It?

DocDroid videos

+ Add

How to embed doc or pdf documents to my blog using docdroid net

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Play Books and DocDroid)

DocDroid

eBook Reader

100 100%

eBook Reader

0% 0

Digital Publishing

38 38%

Digital Publishing

62% 62

Ebooks

100 100%

Ebooks

0% 0

Slideshow

0 0%

Slideshow

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Play Books and DocDroid. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Play Books and DocDroid

Google Play Books Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Play Books yet.
Be the first one to post

DocDroid Reviews

Top 25 SlideShare Alternatives To Create & Share Online Presentations

Docdroid let you upload your presentation in any format such as PPTX, PPT, ODP, KEY, and PDF. Then Docdroid automatically converts your files into PDFs which you can share online or embed on your own website. Your audience can view the presentation from any device.

Source: slidehelper.com

Top 9 Slideshare Alternatives

Docdroid is pretty much like Hashdoc, although you cannot sell your content and get statistics on it. Again, Docdroid turns your PowerPoint presentations into static PDF-like documents. Besides PowerPoints, you can host Word, Excel, text and PDF files. Apart from that, you will get the following:

Source: www.ispringsolutions.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Play Books seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 106 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Play Books mentions (106)

Tell HN: Correct Result for "Google Books" in Bing but Not in Google
Searching for "google books" in google leads to https://books.google.com/ which no longer allows you to read any of your books. https://play.google.com/books is the site to read your purchased books now. Google search does not show https://play.google.com/books in its results at all. Thought it was some weird personalization quirk, but seems others have had the same issue:... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Engineer Bob Novak talks about UFO propulsion and anti-gravity in a 1963 recording
Please use google https://google.com , https://groups.google.com , news.google.com/newspapers, books.google.com, scholar.google.com , https://archive.org https://yandex.com (the only image reverse search which actually works, google's got broken). Source: 5 months ago
Google Only Giving Book Results After Update
I have no idea why, but ever since this new update, Chrome has become completely unusable. Every single search I make only retrieves books.google.com links. Nothing near relevant to what I want. I am not sure how to fix this issue. All help is greatly appreciated! Source: 6 months ago
The Battle over Books3 Could Change AI Forever
Like these guys? https://books.google.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
The Curious Case of Jeff Nadu
Now I think the “Jeff reads Wikipedia” criticism is a tad bit too far, but the problem of his reliance on books (that we should definitely not read) and some surface-level sources manifests itself perfectly in that video. Ralph Natale made an ass out of himself by publishing that book. It contains untrue stories that take away from his credibility and “mob resume”, and for some bizarre reason, didn’t include... Source: 9 months ago