Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Open Source VS localhost.run

Compare Google Open Source VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Google Open Source logo Google Open Source

All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • Google Open Source Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Google Open Source features and specs

  • Community Support
    Google Open Source projects often have large, active communities that contribute to the software's development and provide support.
  • Innovation
    Google frequently publishes cutting-edge projects, allowing developers to utilize the latest in technology and innovation.
  • Quality Documentation
    Google Open Source projects generally come with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to integrate and utilize their tools.
  • Scalability
    Many of Google's open-source projects are designed to scale efficiently, benefiting from Google's extensive experience in handling large-scale systems.
  • Integration with Other Google Services
    Open-source projects from Google often integrate smoothly with other Google services and platforms, providing a cohesive ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of Google Open Source

  • Dependency on Google
    Being tied to Google ecosystems might lead to dependencies, making it harder for developers to switch to other alternatives.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Some developers are wary of data privacy issues when using tools developed by Google, given the company's history with data collection.
  • Complexity
    Google’s projects can sometimes be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with their systems and methodologies.
  • Licensing Issues
    Open-source licensing can sometimes pose challenges, especially for companies trying to ensure compliance with multiple licensing requirements.
  • Longevity and Support
    Not all Google open-source projects have long-term support, and there is a risk that some projects may be abandoned or shelved.

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Open Source and localhost.run)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Open Source and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Open Source and localhost.run

Google Open Source Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Open Source yet.
Be the first one to post

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run should be more popular than Google Open Source. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Open Source mentions (25)

View more

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Open Source and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

LaunchKit - Open Source - A popular suite of developer tools, now 100% open source.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

GitHub Sponsors - Get paid to build what you love on GitHub

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.