Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Container security VS AppArmor

Compare Google Container security VS AppArmor and see what are their differences

Google Container security logo Google Container security

Discover how to secure your Kubernetes Engine container environment on Google Cloud Platform (GCP).

AppArmor logo AppArmor

A Mandatory Access Control (MAC) system which is a kernel (LSM) enhancement to confine programs to...
  • Google Container security Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20
  • AppArmor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-13

Google Container security features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security Features
    Google Container security offers a wide range of security features such as vulnerability scanning, binary authorization, and network policies, which help in protecting containerized applications from various threats.
  • Integration with Google Cloud
    It seamlessly integrates with Google Cloud services, offering a cohesive security environment that benefits from Google’s extensive infrastructure and security resources.
  • Automatic Security Updates
    Google Container security can automatically apply security patches and updates, ensuring that containers are protected against known vulnerabilities without requiring manual intervention.
  • Policy Enforcement
    Users can define and enforce security policies at scale, helping to maintain a consistent security posture across all containerized environments.
  • Scalability and Performance
    Being part of Google's infrastructure, it benefits from the scalability and performance enhancements of Google Cloud, ensuring that security features do not become a bottleneck.

Possible disadvantages of Google Container security

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and integrations can lead to a steep learning curve and complexity in managing and configuring security settings properly.
  • Cost
    While offering robust security, the cost can be significant, especially for smaller organizations or projects that may not fully utilize all features.
  • Dependency on Google Cloud
    Organizations that rely heavily on multi-cloud strategies may find the integration with Google Cloud a limitation if they want to use similar security features across different cloud providers.
  • Limited to Kubernetes
    This security solution is tailored for Kubernetes, which might limit its applicability if an organization uses multiple container orchestration platforms.
  • Potential Overhead
    Additional security features might introduce overhead, impacting the performance of containerized applications if not correctly configured or optimized.

AppArmor features and specs

  • Granular Access Control
    AppArmor allows for fine-grained control over what resources applications can access, enhancing system security by limiting application capabilities to only what is necessary.
  • Ease of Use
    Compared to some other security modules like SELinux, AppArmor is considered easier to configure and deploy, making it more accessible for system administrators.
  • Profile-Based Security
    AppArmor uses profiles to define policies for applications. These profiles can be tailored specifically for different applications, providing a customized security approach.
  • Compatibility
    AppArmor is compatible with various Linux distributions, making it a versatile option for different environments.

Possible disadvantages of AppArmor

  • Limited to Linux
    AppArmor is specifically designed for Linux operating systems, which might be a limitation for organizations using diverse operating systems.
  • Profile Maintenance
    The need to regularly update and maintain profiles as applications change or are updated can be resource-intensive and requires ongoing attention.
  • Less Comprehensive Than SELinux
    Some experts argue that AppArmor is not as comprehensive in its security capabilities as SELinux, which might be a drawback for environments requiring advanced security features.
  • Bypass Possibilities
    There may be potential for apps to bypass AppArmor policies if not correctly configured, potentially leading to security vulnerabilities.

Google Container security videos

No Google Container security videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

AppArmor videos

How to use apparmor: 2-Minute Linux Tips

More videos:

  • Review - Aaron Jones: Introduction To Firejail, AppArmor, and SELinux
  • Review - Securing Ubuntu 18 04 with Apparmor

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Container security and AppArmor)
Monitoring Tools
42 42%
58% 58
Online Services
54 54%
46% 46
Security
44 44%
56% 56
Security Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Container security and AppArmor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Container security seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Container security mentions (1)

  • Does the telecom industry need the cloud?
    For example, Google Cloud offers the Anthos solution to manage cloud networks, promising to modernize security with a zero trust security model‎, simplified patching and compliance, and centralized management. Source: over 2 years ago

AppArmor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AppArmor yet. Tracking of AppArmor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Container security and AppArmor, you can also consider the following products

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Sysdig - Sysdig is an open source, system-level exploration that capture system state and activity from a running Linux instance, then save, filter and analyze.

StackRox - StackRox provides an innovative and comprehensive solution with seamless integration for Kubernetes-native security that focuses on the container.

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection - Symantec Cloud Workload Protection enables business agility and cost savings by automating security for public cloud workloads. Visit Symantec to learn more.