Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Google Cloud Resource Manager VS ProjectSend

Compare Google Cloud Resource Manager VS ProjectSend and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Google Cloud Resource Manager logo Google Cloud Resource Manager

Resource Manager provides methods that you can use to programmatically manage your projects on Google Cloud Platform.

ProjectSend logo ProjectSend

ProjectSend is a self-hosted application that lets users upload files and assign them to specific clients.
  • Google Cloud Resource Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • ProjectSend Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-03

Google Cloud Resource Manager features and specs

  • Hierarchical Management
    Allows users to manage resources in a hierarchical structure, such as organizations, folders, and projects, for improved organization and control.
  • Access Control
    Provides fine-grained access control through Identity and Access Management (IAM), enabling users to set precise permissions across resources.
  • Resource Organization
    Facilitates resource organization and grouping, making it easier to understand and manage infrastructure across multiple projects and environments.
  • Audit Logs
    Enables auditing and monitoring of resource changes, which is crucial for compliance and security purposes.
  • Automation
    Supports automation through APIs and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools, enhancing efficiency and reducing manual overhead.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Resource Manager

  • Complexity
    The hierarchical management and access control features can add complexity, requiring a learning curve for effective use.
  • Dependency on IAM
    Heavily reliant on IAM for access management, which, if not configured correctly, can lead to security vulnerabilities or access issues.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of the resource hierarchy can be time-consuming, especially for organizations with large-scale deployments.
  • Limited Regional Availability
    Certain features or capabilities might be limited based on the specific Google Cloud region, affecting the global consistency of deployments.
  • Cost Implications
    While the tool itself isn't charged, mismanagement and inefficient resource organization can lead to increased costs elsewhere in the Google Cloud ecosystem.

ProjectSend features and specs

  • Open Source
    ProjectSend is an open-source software, meaning it is free to use, modify, and distribute, providing flexibility and cost efficiency for businesses and individual users.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to upload, manage, and share files without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Client Management
    ProjectSend allows users to create accounts for clients, enabling tailored access to files and enhancing security by only allowing specific users to view certain documents.
  • Strong File Management
    It supports a range of file types, offers file version control, and provides an easy-to-navigate folder structure for efficient file organization.
  • Activity Logging
    The platform includes detailed logging of user activities, allowing administrators to monitor file access and changes, bolstering security and accountability.

Possible disadvantages of ProjectSend

  • Limited Scalability
    ProjectSend might not be the best fit for large enterprises needing to manage an extensive amount of data, as it is primarily designed for small to medium projects.
  • Technical Setup
    Installing and configuring ProjectSend can be complex for users without technical expertise, as it requires setting up a web server, database, and some manual configuration.
  • Lack of Integrations
    Compared to some commercial file management solutions, ProjectSend offers limited integration options with third-party applications, which can hinder workflow automation.
  • Performance Issues
    Users have reported performance lags when handling very large files or when multiple users are accessing the system simultaneously, which can affect productivity.
  • Basic Features Only
    While ProjectSend covers essential file management functions, it lacks some advanced features found in paid alternatives, such as advanced search, AI capabilities, and robust collaboration tools.

Google Cloud Resource Manager videos

No Google Cloud Resource Manager videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

ProjectSend videos

+ Add

Client Success: ProjectSend - Xceptional Client Delivery for Large File & Archive Sharing

More videos:

  • Review - Tutorial: ProjectSend - Filesharing Software installieren [ FREE ] [ German/HD ]
  • Review - installing ProjectSend on Ubuntu Linux

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Resource Manager and ProjectSend)

Google Cloud Resource Manager

ProjectSend

Cloud Storage
55 55%
Cloud Storage
45% 45
Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
File Sharing
100% 100
Work Collaboration
100 100%
Work Collaboration
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Resource Manager and ProjectSend. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Cloud Resource Manager and ProjectSend

Google Cloud Resource Manager Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Cloud Resource Manager yet.
Be the first one to post

ProjectSend Reviews

16 Tresorit Alternatives
ProjectSend is a self-hosted platform which enables the users to upload files and share them with their clients. The platform is secure and private and is made in PHP while using a MySQL database to store information. This hosted software is installed on the user’s server, which keeps the files safe as they upload them on their own space.
Source: www.topbestalternatives.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Resource Manager seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Resource Manager mentions (1)

  • Google Cloud Reference
    Cloud Resource Manager: Cloud project metadata management 🔗Link 🔗Link. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

ProjectSend mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ProjectSend yet. Tracking of ProjectSend recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Resource Manager and ProjectSend, you can also consider the following products

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage

BoxCryptor - Boxcryptor encrypts your sensitive files before uploading them to cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Box, and many others.

Azure File Storage - Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.

Cloudfogger - Easy and secure encryption for the cloud. Provides security for all cloud storage services like Dropbox, OneDrive and Google Drive.

Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.

Mega - Secure File Storage and collaboration

Loading...