Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Cloud Resource Manager VS IBM Cloud Object Storage

Compare Google Cloud Resource Manager VS IBM Cloud Object Storage and see what are their differences

Google Cloud Resource Manager logo Google Cloud Resource Manager

Resource Manager provides methods that you can use to programmatically manage your projects on Google Cloud Platform.

IBM Cloud Object Storage logo IBM Cloud Object Storage

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a platform that offers cost-effective and scalable cloud storage for unstructured data.
  • Google Cloud Resource Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • IBM Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

Google Cloud Resource Manager features and specs

  • Hierarchical Management
    Allows users to manage resources in a hierarchical structure, such as organizations, folders, and projects, for improved organization and control.
  • Access Control
    Provides fine-grained access control through Identity and Access Management (IAM), enabling users to set precise permissions across resources.
  • Resource Organization
    Facilitates resource organization and grouping, making it easier to understand and manage infrastructure across multiple projects and environments.
  • Audit Logs
    Enables auditing and monitoring of resource changes, which is crucial for compliance and security purposes.
  • Automation
    Supports automation through APIs and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools, enhancing efficiency and reducing manual overhead.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Resource Manager

  • Complexity
    The hierarchical management and access control features can add complexity, requiring a learning curve for effective use.
  • Dependency on IAM
    Heavily reliant on IAM for access management, which, if not configured correctly, can lead to security vulnerabilities or access issues.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of the resource hierarchy can be time-consuming, especially for organizations with large-scale deployments.
  • Limited Regional Availability
    Certain features or capabilities might be limited based on the specific Google Cloud region, affecting the global consistency of deployments.
  • Cost Implications
    While the tool itself isn't charged, mismanagement and inefficient resource organization can lead to increased costs elsewhere in the Google Cloud ecosystem.

IBM Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    IBM Cloud Object Storage offers very high scalability, allowing businesses to store large amounts of data easily. This flexibility is crucial for businesses that are growing their storage needs or have fluctuating demands.
  • Data Resiliency
    The service provides robust data resiliency options, including geo-dispersed storage configurations, enabling enhanced protection against data loss and improved availability.
  • Cost Efficiency
    With its flexible pricing model, businesses can choose options that best fit their budget, such as 'Pay-as-you-go' plans, thereby optimizing costs according to actual usage.
  • Security Features
    It comes with comprehensive security features, including encryption, access control, and integration with IAM policies, ensuring that data is protected both at rest and in transit.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with the broader IBM Cloud ecosystem, as well as other cloud services and applications, allows businesses to easily incorporate this storage solution into their existing cloud strategy.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Cloud Object Storage

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and customization options might lead to a steeper learning curve for new users or smaller teams without dedicated IT resources.
  • Performance Variability
    Depending on the region and specific use case, users might encounter variability in performance, particularly in scenarios requiring low-latency or high-throughput data access.
  • Support Availability
    While IBM offers various support plans, certain users might find the support mechanisms, such as community forums and basic plans, less responsive compared to some other providers.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although pricing models are flexible, they can also become complex and convoluted, making it difficult for some businesses to predict costs precisely without detailed monitoring and analysis.
  • Limited Proprietary Tooling
    Compared to some competitors, IBM might have fewer proprietary tools and native applications directly integrated with their cloud storage, potentially requiring additional third-party tools or custom development for specific needs.

Google Cloud Resource Manager videos

No Google Cloud Resource Manager videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

IBM Cloud Object Storage videos

IBM Cloud Object Storage: Built for business

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with IBM Cloud Object Storage
  • Review - IBM Cloud Object Storage webinar

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Resource Manager and IBM Cloud Object Storage)
Cloud Storage
27 27%
73% 73
Cloud Computing
5 5%
95% 95
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Work Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Resource Manager and IBM Cloud Object Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Resource Manager seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Resource Manager mentions (1)

  • Google Cloud Reference
    Cloud Resource Manager: Cloud project metadata management 🔗Link 🔗Link. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

IBM Cloud Object Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet. Tracking of IBM Cloud Object Storage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Resource Manager and IBM Cloud Object Storage, you can also consider the following products

Azure File Storage - Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.

Alibaba Object Storage Service - Alibaba Object Storage Service is an encrypted and secure cloud storage service which stores, processes and accesses massive amounts of data

Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.