Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Cloud Build VS Azure Container Instances

Compare Google Cloud Build VS Azure Container Instances and see what are their differences

Google Cloud Build logo Google Cloud Build

A fully managed continuous integration, delivery, & deployment platform that lets you build, test, and deploy in the cloud. Focus on coding by running fast, consistent, reliable automated builds.

Azure Container Instances logo Azure Container Instances

Easily run application containers in the cloud with a single command. Azure Container Instances lets you get started in seconds and lower your infrastructure costs with per-second billing.
  • Google Cloud Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • Azure Container Instances Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05

Google Cloud Build features and specs

  • Scalability
    Google Cloud Build allows you to scale your build workloads seamlessly. It can handle a large number of concurrent builds without compromising performance, making it suitable for organizations with varying build demands.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Google Cloud services and third-party tools, facilitating a streamlined development workflow. This integration capabilities enhance productivity by allowing developers to leverage existing tools.
  • Security
    Google Cloud Build provides robust security features, including encrypted storage of build artifacts, ensuring that your build processes and outputs are secure.
  • Customization
    With support for custom build steps and triggers, users can tailor their CI/CD pipeline according to their specific needs, offering a high degree of flexibility.
  • Pricing
    The service offers a free tier which makes it accessible for small projects or startups, and the pay-as-you-go model ensures that you only pay for the resources you use.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Build

  • Complex Onboarding
    New users may find the initial setup and learning curve steep, especially if they are not already familiar with Google Cloud Platform or CI/CD concepts.
  • Cost Management
    While it offers competitive pricing, managing costs can become complex as usage scales up, particularly if builds are not optimized for efficiency.
  • Limited Non-Google Integration
    Although integrations with Google Cloud services are robust, integration with non-Google tools and services might not be as seamless, potentially leading to compatibility issues.
  • Regional Availability
    Build execution locations might be limited to certain regions, which can impact build times and performance for globally distributed teams.
  • UI Complexity
    Some users report that the UI can be complex and not as intuitive as other CI/CD tools, which might impact the user experience especially for new users.

Azure Container Instances features and specs

  • Simplified Deployment
    Azure Container Instances allows for quick and easy deployment of containers without the need for managing virtual machines or orchestrators.
  • Scalability
    ACIs can be scaled up or down based on demand, providing flexibility and cost-efficiency for varying workloads.
  • Cost-Effective
    You only pay for the compute resources you use, making it ideal for quick tasks and short-lived workloads.
  • Integration with Azure Services
    ACIs can be easily integrated with other Azure services such as Azure Virtual Networks, Azure Monitor, and Azure Logs for comprehensive cloud solutions.
  • Fast Start-up
    Containers start quickly in ACIs, allowing for rapid scaling and fast execution of workloads.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Container Instances

  • Limited Orchestration
    ACIs lack the advanced orchestration capabilities seen in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) or other orchestrators, which may be necessary for complex applications.
  • Statefulness Limitations
    ACIs are best suited for stateless applications. Managing stateful applications may require additional services and configurations.
  • Not Ideal for Long-Running Workloads
    Though cost-effective for short tasks, ACIs may become expensive for long-running applications compared to other container solutions.
  • Limited Customization
    ACIs provide fewer customization options in terms of infrastructure and configurations compared to managing your own VMs or using AKS.
  • Networking Constraints
    While ACIs integrate with virtual networks, there are limitations on advanced networking features, which might be crucial for complex network architectures.

Google Cloud Build videos

[Full Workshop] Build a Multi-Step Google Cloud Build Pipeline from Scratch!

Azure Container Instances videos

Azure Container Instances Tutorial | Serverless containers in cloud

More videos:

  • Review - Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) & Azure Container Instances (ACI) For Beginners

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Build and Azure Container Instances)
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
35 35%
65% 65
DevOps Tools
35 35%
65% 65
Containers As A Service
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Build and Azure Container Instances. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Build should be more popular than Azure Container Instances. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Build mentions (17)

View more

Azure Container Instances mentions (8)

  • Azure Container Instances vs Sliplane
    Azure Container Instances (ACI) and Sliplane both simplify deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications. However, there are some key differences, and both platforms serve different users and use cases. Let's compare them side by side. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • A Brief History Of Serverless
    This model was so successful that we started to see others create competitors such as AWS Fargate and Azure Container Instances. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Similar to AWS Fargate provider?
    Https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/container-instances and as /u/re-thc posted, GKE Autopilot can be that for Google Cloud. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Deploy Application on Azure App Services
    Containerize and deploy the application using one of the container delivery services on Azure like App Services, Container Instances, or Kubernetes Services. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Run Apache APISIX on Microsoft Azure Container Instance
    Apache APISIX is an open-source Microservice API gateway and platform designed for managing microservices requests of high availability, fault tolerance, and distributed system. You can install Apache APISIX by the different methods (Docker, Helm, or RPM) and run it in the various public cloud providers because of its cloud-native behavior. In this post, you will learn how easily run Apache APISIX API Gateway in... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Build and Azure Container Instances, you can also consider the following products

AWS CodePipeline - Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

Google Kubernetes Engine - Google Kubernetes Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Set up a cluster in minutes.

Data Fabric - Data Fabric is an architecture and set of data services that provide consistent capabilities across a choice of endpoints spanning on-premises and multiple cloud environments.

Apache Mesos - Apache Mesos abstracts resources away from machines, enabling fault-tolerant and elastic distributed systems to easily be built and run effectively.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service