Based on our record, Amazon Aurora should be more popular than Google Cloud Bigtable. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In my opinion, Google has built some fantastic database services like Bigtable and Spanner, which literally changed the industry for good, and I am eager to see how they will build upon this new service. With AlloyDB's disaggregated architecture, the dystopian world where I only pay for SQL databases per query and the stored data on GCP seems closer than ever. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Cloud Bigtable: Petabyte-scale, low-latency, non-relational 🔗Link 🔗Link. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
> These triples say that the Layer with id 1 has a fontSize 20 and backgroundColor blue. Since they are different rows, there’s no conflict. This sounds a lot like Bigtable (https://cloud.google.com/bigtable), which also does last-write-wins conflict resolution layer. So this is adding a GraphQL + frontend layer to it? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Google's BigTable paper inspired this database design, and it is capable of handling large data loads on distributed machines. In addition, column-oriented databases provide efficient compression and high performance with aggregated queries such as sum, average, and minimum. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Because of these and other differences, the tools used are also different. With batch processing, data might be read from large files, processed, and stored in an OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) database (like MySQL) or OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) system (like Google BigQuery). But these would not be good solutions for streaming applications, because they are not optimized for high throughput on a lot... Source: over 2 years ago
As far as the big players are concerned, Google offers AlloyDB (https://cloud.google.com/alloydb) while Amazon offers Aurora (https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/). - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Aurora is a managed database service from Amazon compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. It allows for the use of existing MySQL code, tools, and applications and can offer increased performance for certain workloads compared to MySQL and PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
See my other comment on this thread. More typically you'd use RDS for external DB. Aurora is a megascale version. Source: 11 months ago
If you get to a point where RDS cannot handle your work load you can migrate to Amazon Aurora: Https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/. Source: about 1 year ago
Just like how DB replication and load-balancers exists for ~20 years, SC is making far worse version of them under different name. So this "budget" thingy is just another distraction for cult to discuss, so the followers can claim "they know game development". Source: about 1 year ago
Amazon DynamoDB - Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service offered by Amazon.
PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.
MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.
MySQL - The world's most popular open source database
Azure Cosmos DB - NoSQL JSON database for rapid, iterative app development.
Oracle DBaaS - See how Oracle Database 12c enables businesses to plug into the cloud and power the real-time enterprise.