Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google App Engine VS Wasabi Cloud Object Storage

Compare Google App Engine VS Wasabi Cloud Object Storage and see what are their differences

Google App Engine logo Google App Engine

A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage logo Wasabi Cloud Object Storage

Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.
  • Google App Engine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-17
  • Wasabi Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-04-16

Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is a scalable, cloud-based object storage service for various applications. It allows storing any type of data in any format, offering high-performance, reliability, and security at a minimal cost. Ideal for individuals and organizations seeking affordable, dependable data storage, Wasabi provides a highly durable and fault-tolerant infrastructure, ensuring data is always accessible and protected. With features like immutable buckets, versioning, and encryption, Wasabi ensures data integrity and security, making it a trusted choice for businesses and individuals alike.

Google App Engine features and specs

  • Auto-scaling
    Google App Engine automatically scales your application based on the traffic it receives, ensuring that your application can handle varying workloads without manual intervention.
  • Managed environment
    App Engine provides a fully managed environment, covering infrastructure management tasks like server provisioning, patching, monitoring, and managing app versions.
  • Integrated services
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services such as Datastore, Cloud SQL, Pub/Sub, and more, offering a comprehensive ecosystem for building and deploying applications.
  • Multiple languages support
    Supports multiple programming languages including Java, Python, PHP, Node.js, Go, Ruby, and .NET, giving developers flexibility in choosing their preferred language.
  • Security
    Offers robust security features including Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Identity, and automated security updates, which help protect your applications from vulnerabilities.
  • Developer productivity
    App Engine allows rapid development and deployment, letting developers focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure management, thus boosting productivity.
  • Versioning
    Supports versioning of applications, allowing multiple versions of the application to be hosted simultaneously, which helps in A/B testing and rollback capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Google App Engine

  • Cost
    While you pay for what you use, costs can escalate quickly with high traffic or resource-intensive applications. Detailed cost prediction can be challenging.
  • Vendor lock-in
    Relying heavily on Google App Engine's proprietary services and APIs can make it difficult to migrate applications to other platforms, leading to vendor lock-in.
  • Limited control
    Being a fully managed service, App Engine provides limited control over the underlying infrastructure which might be a limitation for certain advanced use cases.
  • Environment constraints
    Certain restrictions and limitations are imposed on the runtime environment, such as request timeout limits and specific resource quotas, which can affect application performance.
  • Complex debugging
    Debugging issues in a highly abstracted managed environment can be more complex and difficult compared to traditional server-hosted applications.
  • Cold start latency
    Serverless environments like App Engine can suffer from cold start latency, where the initial request triggers a delay as the environment spins up resources.
  • Configuration complexity
    Despite its benefits, configuring and optimizing App Engine for specific scenarios can be more complex than expected, requiring a steep learning curve.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Cost-Effective
    Wasabi offers competitive pricing for cloud storage without any hidden fees, making it a cost-effective option for businesses of all sizes.
  • High Performance
    Wasabi provides high-speed data retrieval and upload, which is ideal for applications requiring fast access to stored data.
  • Simple Pricing Model
    There are no fees for egress or API requests, which simplifies budgeting and cost management.
  • Scalability
    Wasabi's storage solutions can scale to meet the needs of growing businesses, providing flexibility as data storage requirements increase.
  • Security
    Wasabi offers strong security features, including data encryption both in transit and at rest, ensuring the safety of stored data.
  • S3 Compatibility
    Wasabi's storage service is compatible with the Amazon S3 API, making it easier for users to integrate with existing tools and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Wasabi Cloud Object Storage

  • Limited Services
    Compared to larger cloud providers like AWS or Google Cloud, Wasabi focuses primarily on storage and offers fewer ancillary services and features.
  • Geographical Availability
    Wasabi has fewer data center locations worldwide compared to major competitors, which might impact performance for users in certain regions.
  • Customer Support
    While Wasabi offers customer support, it may not be as comprehensive or as responsive as the support provided by larger cloud service providers.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    Although it supports S3 compatibility, Wasabi might not integrate as seamlessly with other cloud ecosystem services beyond storage.
  • No Free Tier
    Unlike some competitors, Wasabi does not offer a free tier for basic storage needs, which could be a drawback for small businesses or startups.

Google App Engine videos

Get to know Google App Engine

More videos:

  • Review - Developing apps that scale automatically with Google App Engine

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage videos

Introduction to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage (August 2021) | Wasabi

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google App Engine and Wasabi Cloud Object Storage)
Cloud Computing
65 65%
35% 35
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Backend As A Service
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Google App Engine and Wasabi Cloud Object Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google App Engine and Wasabi Cloud Object Storage

Google App Engine Reviews

Top 5 Alternatives to Heroku
Google App Engine is fast, easy, but not that very cheap. The pricing is reasonable, and it comes with a free tier, which is great for small projects that are right for beginner developers who want to quickly set up their apps. It can also auto scale, create new instances as needed and automatically handle high availability. App Engine gets a positive rating for performance...
AppScale - The Google App Engine Alternative
AppScale is open source Google App Engine and allows you to run your GAE applications on any infrastructure, anywhere that makes sense for your business. AppScale eliminates lock-in and makes your GAE application portable. This way you can choose which public or private cloud platform is the best fit for your business requirements. Because we are literally the GAE...

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage Reviews

7 Best Amazon S3 Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Wasabi hot storage differentiates itself against industry giants like Amazon S3 by offering storage that’s six times faster and up to 80% cheaper.
Wasabi, Storj, Backblaze et al, are promising 80%+ savings compared to Amazon S3... What's the catch?
On the surface, Wasabi looks appealing with a simple pricing structure ($5.99/TB/mo) that comes with free egress and free operations. How can Wasabi afford this, you ask? Well, their business model relies on their user-base keeping their data stored (and unchanged) for some time and not consuming more than their fair share of resources, which they regulate via a handful of...
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wasabi Cloud Object Storage should be more popular than Google App Engine. It has been mentiond 70 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google App Engine mentions (31)

  • Guide to modern app-hosting without servers on Google Cloud
    If Google App Engine (GAE) is the "OG" serverless platform, Cloud Run (GCR) is its logical successor, crafted for today's modern app-hosting needs. GAE was the 1st generation of Google serverless platforms. It has since been joined, about a decade later, by 2nd generation services, GCR and Cloud Functions (GCF). GCF is somewhat out-of-scope for this post so I'll cover that another time. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Security in the Cloud: Your Role in the Shared Responsibility Model
    As Windsales Inc. expands, it adopts a PaaS model to offload server and runtime management, allowing its developers and engineers to focus on code development and deployment. By partnering with providers like Heroku and Google App Engine, Windsales Inc. Accesses a fully managed runtime environment. This choice relieves Windsales Inc. Of managing servers, OS updates, or runtime environment behavior. Instead,... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Hosting apps in the cloud with Google App Engine in 2024
    Google App Engine (GAE) is their original serverless solution and first cloud product, launching in 2008 (video), giving rise to Serverless 1.0 and the cloud computing platform-as-a-service (PaaS) service level. It didn't do function-hosting nor was the concept of containers mainstream yet. GAE was specifically for (web) app-hosting (but also supported mobile backends as well). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Fixing A Broken Deployment to Google App Engine
    In 2014, I took a web development on Udacity that was taught by Steve Huffman of Reddit fame. He taught authentication, salting passwords, the difference between GET and POST requests, basic html and css, caching techniques. It was a fantastic introduction to web dev. To pass the course, students deployed simple python servers to Google App Engine. When I started to look for work, I opted to use code from that... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Next.js Deployment: Vercel's Charm vs. GCP's Muscle
    GCP offers a comprehensive suite of cloud services, including Compute Engine, App Engine, and Cloud Run. This translates to unparalleled control over your infrastructure and deployment configurations. Designed for large-scale applications, GCP effortlessly scales to accommodate significant traffic growth. Additionally, for projects heavily reliant on Google services like BigQuery, Cloud Storage, or AI/ML tools,... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage mentions (70)

  • Using ColdFusion to Generate Pre-Signed Wasabi Download URL
    There was an internal decision to use Wasabi Cloud Storage instead of Amazon S3 and I needed to use ColdFusion to generate a pre-signed URL to allow access to AI-generated content for a limited time. I had used the Sv4Util.cfc and aws-cfml libraries before with Amazon and thought it was just as simple, but I got confused somewhere along the way and it just wasn't working. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How much 1 TB of egress costs by cloud provider
    This table is missing Wasabi [0], which has free egress. [0]: https://wasabi.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • What makes backblaze better than some of the other options out there?
    Backblaze is great because it's a set price, unlimited, and I don't have to think twice about it. I use Arq to backup my machine + external drives (several drives with lots of photos) to my local NAS. Was sending data to Wasabi, but the costs got out of control. I can purchase a year's worth of Backblaze + the 1 year revision upgrade for much, much less of what I was paying at Wasabi. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • The NixOS Foundation’s Call to Action: S3 Costs Require Community Support
    What about looking at Wasabi? It’s $5.99 per TB per month https://wasabi.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • A web application that will need to store lots of image files. The company wants to use Dropbox for image storage. Is this okay?
    No, use AWS S3 or https://wasabi.com/ if you are worried about cost. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google App Engine and Wasabi Cloud Object Storage, you can also consider the following products

Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash

Hetzner Object Storage - Scalable object storage, S3-compatible and ideal for growing data volumes. Secure and flexible for efficient data storage.

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Alibaba Object Storage Service - Alibaba Object Storage Service is an encrypted and secure cloud storage service which stores, processes and accesses massive amounts of data