Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than Google App Engine. While we know about 466 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 25 mentions of Google App Engine. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
To deploy the app, we can use Google Cloud App Engine, which is specifically built for server-side rendered websites. After we create a new project in the Google Cloud Console, we have to configure the cql-trace-viewer application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
I've read that article, but I'm thinking there are other better (and most importantly cheaper) ways of doing that, such as using App Engine (given that you have to mitigate the maximum request timeout and to make sure there are constantly exactly 1 instance running). Source: 12 months ago
Shout out to GCP App Engine for deploying anode/Express severe. Source: 12 months ago
If your project is a bit more complicated using next.js or react.js or angular.js, you may find some free Platfrom-as-a-Service%20is%20a%20complete%20cloud%20environment,middleware%2C%20tools%2C%20and%20more.). I have seen some of my peers using free PaaS like Heroku, Vercel and I have no experience in using PaaS but I will recommend you to use PaaS from either of the three 1. Google Cloud's Google App Engine 2.... Source: about 1 year ago
UNIX is irrelevant on the cloud, unless one is stuck deploying legacy workloads on VMs, this is what we use in modern applications not stuck in the past. https://aws.amazon.com/eks/ https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/kubernetes-service https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/ https://cloud.google.com/appengine https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/app-service https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
For this application, Elm controlled the routing. So, I had to adapt the scripts to deploy to Netlify instead of GitHub Pages. Why? Because you need to be able to tell the web server to redirect all relevant requests to the application. GitHub Pages doesn't have support for it. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
It's super easy to publish a static site like the resume with GitHub Pages. Just check out the docs. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Ideal for open source projects, docs sites, and portfolios. GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket