goa VS KrakenD

My experience of Golang is that dependency injection doesn't really have much benefit. It felt like a square peg in a round hole exercise when my team considered it. The team was almost exclusively Java/Typescript Devs so it was something that we thought we needed but I don't believe we actually missed once we decided to not pursue it. If you are looking at OpenAPI in Golang I can recommend having a look at... - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago

See https://goa.design/. It automates all the comms stuff, so you just write: 1) a design file showing your functions, 2) an implantation of those functions, and 3) a very generic "main.go" (basically the same for all your services) that decides "how is this exposed over gRPC or REST or other comms?". The rest of the code is generated. Source: 5 months ago

If you really need a framework, you can take a look at Echo or, for a contract-first approach, https://goa.design/. Source: 10 months ago

Few folks in here are (rightly) frustrated with the code generation story and broader tooling support around the OpenAPI standard. I've found a few alternative approaches quite nice to work with: - Use a DSL to describe your service and have it spit out the OpenAPI spec as well as server stubs. In other words, I wouldn't bother writing OpenAPI directly - it's an artifact that is generated at build time. As a Go... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

One of the biggest issues I see is that you are using the same models for API as you are for the database. That wouldn’t fly in a real work system. And even though your doing simple CRUD I would introduce another layer for business logic. You should never have the Controller calling you database code directly. It never “stays” that simplistic. One of the easiest ways to deal with this is to use... Source: 11 months ago

I looked at MS APIM but found it hard to swallow the cost (I think we were looking at ~$20k annually) and spun up KrakenD on a container instead. The Community Edition does 99% of what we need and is much more cost effective. Give it a look. Source: over 1 year ago