Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Pascal VS PureBasic

Compare GNU Pascal VS PureBasic and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

GNU Pascal logo GNU Pascal

The GNU Pascal Compiler (GPC) is, as the name says, the Pascal compiler of the GNU family,

PureBasic logo PureBasic

Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.
  • GNU Pascal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-14
  • PureBasic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21

GNU Pascal features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

PureBasic features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    PureBasic supports Windows, Linux, and Mac OS, allowing developers to write code once and run it on multiple operating systems without modifications.
  • Simple Syntax
    The language has a straightforward and easy-to-learn syntax, making it accessible for beginners and enabling rapid development.
  • Fast Executables
    PureBasic compiles directly to native machine code, resulting in fast and efficient executables with minimal dependencies.
  • Comprehensive Standard Library
    The language provides a wide range of built-in libraries that simplify tasks like GUI creation, networking, and multimedia management.
  • Active Community
    PureBasic has an active and supportive community, offering forums, tutorials, and third-party resources that can help developers solve problems and enhance their projects.

Possible disadvantages of PureBasic

  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    Compared to more popular languages, PureBasic has fewer third-party libraries and frameworks, which can limit functionality and integrations.
  • Niche Market
    PureBasic is not as widely used as other programming languages, which can result in fewer job opportunities and community resources.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    The language is designed to be simple, which means it may lack some advanced programming constructs and paradigms found in other languages.
  • License Cost
    PureBasic is not free software; there is a one-time cost associated with obtaining a license, which may be a consideration for developers or small businesses with budget constraints.
  • Basic IDE
    The integrated development environment that comes with PureBasic is quite basic compared to modern IDEs, potentially impacting coding efficiency.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Pascal and PureBasic)

GNU Pascal

PureBasic

Text Editors
21 21%
Text Editors
79% 79
IDE
18 18%
IDE
82% 82
Programming Language
14 14%
Programming Language
86% 86
Software Development
100 100%
Software Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Pascal and PureBasic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Pascal and PureBasic, you can also consider the following products

Free Pascal - Free Pascal (aka FPK Pascal) is a 32 and 64 bit professional Pascal compiler.

Xojo - Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.

Lazarus - Lazarus is a cross-platform IDE for the Free Pascal compiler.

FreeBASIC - FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...

PascalABC.NET - The new generation Pascal programming language that combines simplicity of classic Pascal, a great number of modern extensions and broad capabilities of Microsoft .NET Framework

PowerBASIC - PowerBASIC, formerly Turbo Basic, is the brand of several commercial compilers by PowerBASIC Inc.

Loading...