Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Make VS Standard JS

Compare GNU Make VS Standard JS and see what are their differences

This page does not exist
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Standard JS logo Standard JS

DevOps, Build, Test, Deploy, and Code Review
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Standard JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and Standard JS)

GNU Make

Standard JS

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
Code Coverage
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
Code Analysis
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and Standard JS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Standard JS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Standard JS mentions (27)

  • Mastering Code Quality: Setting Up ESLint with Standard JS in TypeScript Projects
    Sorry, I've gone too far. I'm not here to persuade you to use Standard JS. My intention is to provide information and guidance on configuring JavaScript Standard Style for your team, should you agree with me or have other reasons to choose it. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Why is Prettier rock solid?
    I picked up standard[1] a while back for this reason, I don't want to have to think about it. It works fine, I have no complaints (took me a while to get used to not using semi-colons but now I prefer it) Same reason I use `cargo fmt` as well. [1] https://standardjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • My prepared repositories for hacktoberfest 23 - any contributions are welcomed 🚀
    A Thin JavaScript Document Storage with Middleware Stack. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Dumb question
    For example, if you use https://standardjs.com/ - it will error on your second code snippet and if you ask it for an autofix - it will transfer the minus sign to the first line. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Unleash the Power of Java: A JavaScript Developer's Guide to Best Practices in Java Development
    In comparison, JavaScript doesn't have a strict coding standard, although it does have widely accepted code style guides like the Airbnb JavaScript Style Guide and the JavaScript Standard Style. These guides provide recommendations for code formatting and naming conventions, but they are not as strictly enforced as the Java coding standard. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and Standard JS, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Prettier - An opinionated code formatter

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

EditorConfig - EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

Loading...