Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Make VS Octopus Deploy

Compare GNU Make VS Octopus Deploy and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Octopus Deploy logo Octopus Deploy

Octopus is a friendly deployment automation tool for .NET developers.
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Octopus Deploy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11

GNU Make

Website
gnu.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Octopus Deploy

Website
octopus.com
Pricing URL
Official Octopus Deploy Pricing
$ Details
Release Date
2012 January
Startup details
Country
Australia
State
Queensland
City
Brisbane
Founder(s)
Paul Stovell
Employees
100 - 249
Edit details

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

Octopus Deploy features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Octopus Deploy provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it accessible to both beginners and experienced users. Its visual pipelines and step templates simplify the deployment process.
  • Automated Deployment
    The platform automates the deployment process, enabling continuous deployment (CD) and reducing manual intervention, which helps in achieving consistent deployments across environments.
  • Multi-Environment Support
    Octopus Deploy supports multiple environments and allows users to define configurations for each environment independently. This ensures that deployments can be tailored to development, testing, and production environments.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Octopus Deploy integrates seamlessly with various CI/CD tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Azure DevOps, as well as cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. This makes it a versatile choice for different tech stacks.
  • Security Features
    The platform offers robust security features such as fine-grained access control, audit trails, and secure data storage, ensuring that deployments are secure and compliant with regulations.
  • Custom Script Support
    Users can leverage custom scripts written in PowerShell, Bash, or other scripting languages to tailor the deployment process to specific requirements.
  • Community and Documentation
    Octopus Deploy boasts an active community and comprehensive documentation, providing valuable resources for troubleshooting and learning best practices.

Possible disadvantages of Octopus Deploy

  • Cost
    Octopus Deploy can be relatively expensive, especially for smaller teams or startups. The licensing model is based on the number of deployment targets, which can quickly add up.
  • Complexity
    Despite its user-friendly interface, complex deployment scenarios may require a steep learning curve. Advanced configurations and custom scripting can be challenging for users without prior experience.
  • Overhead
    Managing the Octopus Deploy server can introduce additional overhead. Regular updates, backups, and maintenance tasks must be scheduled to keep the system running smoothly.
  • Performance Issues
    In some instances, users have reported performance bottlenecks, particularly in large-scale deployments with numerous targets and projects.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier of Octopus Deploy is limited in terms of features and the number of deployment targets, which may not be sufficient for growing teams needing more robust capabilities.

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Octopus Deploy videos

+ Add

Introducing Octopus Deploy

More videos:

  • Review - Octopus Deploy Crash Course - May - 2019 by Rajesh Kumar
  • Review - Deployment Automation with Octopus Deploy and TeamCity

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and Octopus Deploy)

GNU Make

Octopus Deploy

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and Octopus Deploy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Octopus Deploy seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Octopus Deploy mentions (19)

  • Is Your Product Manager Hurting Platform Engineering?
    This is how Octopus Deploy was created. In 2010, Paul Stovell was frustrated that deployments were so painful when so many other software delivery tasks had been automated. Why was build and test automation a solved problem while deployments were such a mess? - Source: dev.to / 27 days ago
  • The Cost Dynamics of Multitenancy
    I also wrote the white paper, A modern view of multi-tenancy, which you can download courtesy of Octopus Deploy. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Shot in the dark
    Check https://raygun.com/blog/top-php-frameworks/ I think you provided not a lot of details so don't expect much. I think you might be mixing https://octopus.com/ with other things. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Alternatives to Helm?
    We use Octopus for our deployments (not only k8s, but pretty much every application we have). It might be too powerful (and expensive) for your needs, but I don't think there is a better tool for any kind of application deployment out there (and if you know of one, especially a cheaper one, please let me know ;-) ). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Good Cron GUI
    Not open source, but there is also https://octopus.com/ which has a free self-hosted version. It's meant to be a deploy tool, but it has a nice ui for creating/running jobs. They can be scheduled or triggered via other methods. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and Octopus Deploy, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Loading...