Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Make VS FindBugs

Compare GNU Make VS FindBugs and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

FindBugs logo FindBugs

Findbugs is a tool that looks for bugs in Java code. Findbugs finds the bugs by analyzing computer software without actually executing programs. Using this software allows for easy debugging and repairing broken script. Read more about FindBugs.
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • FindBugs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-11

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

FindBugs videos

+ Add

Static Code Analysis With FindBugs: Step By Step Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and FindBugs)

GNU Make

FindBugs

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
Code Coverage
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
Code Analysis
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and FindBugs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GNU Make and FindBugs

GNU Make Reviews

We have no reviews of GNU Make yet.
Be the first one to post

FindBugs Reviews

TOP 40 Static Code Analysis Tools (Best Source Code Analysis Tools)
A tool that helps in analyzing C/C++, Java, C#, RPG and Python codes. Another good thing about this tool is it allows integration with free static checker tools like cppcheck, PMD, FindBugs. Basic Version of this tool is free but it comes with fewer features. Based on the need, you can decide whether the free version satisfies the requirement or not.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FindBugs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

FindBugs mentions (3)

  • Scanning for flaws?
    The tools generally depend on the programming language. You might be looking for something like a "linter" or static analyzer (i.e. FindBugs for Java). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why we need multiple code analysis tools?
    These tools perform analysis on the application's source code without executing/running the code on a platform. In other words, a bot goes line by line of source code to find any bug defined by preconfigured policies/rules. It could be compared to manual code review, but the review is done by a bot. Mostly, code quality, coding standard aspects are targeted to be scanned. The biggest name in static code analysis... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Review of Java Static Analysis Tools
    FindBugs looks for bugs in Java Code, and this means over 400 different bugs. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and FindBugs, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Pmd - PMD scans Java source code and looks for potential problems like:

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Loading...