Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

FindBugs VS Ninja Build

Compare FindBugs VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

FindBugs logo FindBugs

Findbugs is a tool that looks for bugs in Java code. Findbugs finds the bugs by analyzing computer software without actually executing programs. Using this software allows for easy debugging and repairing broken script. Read more about FindBugs.

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
  • FindBugs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-11
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

FindBugs videos

+ Add

Static Code Analysis With FindBugs: Step By Step Tutorial

Ninja Build videos

+ Add

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FindBugs and Ninja Build)

FindBugs

Ninja Build

Code Coverage
100 100%
Code Coverage
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Code Analysis
100 100%
Code Analysis
0% 0
JavaScript Package Manager
0 0%
JavaScript Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FindBugs and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FindBugs and Ninja Build

FindBugs Reviews

TOP 40 Static Code Analysis Tools (Best Source Code Analysis Tools)
A tool that helps in analyzing C/C++, Java, C#, RPG and Python codes. Another good thing about this tool is it allows integration with free static checker tools like cppcheck, PMD, FindBugs. Basic Version of this tool is free but it comes with fewer features. Based on the need, you can decide whether the free version satisfies the requirement or not.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Ninja Build Reviews

We have no reviews of Ninja Build yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build should be more popular than FindBugs. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FindBugs mentions (3)

  • Scanning for flaws?
    The tools generally depend on the programming language. You might be looking for something like a "linter" or static analyzer (i.e. FindBugs for Java). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why we need multiple code analysis tools?
    These tools perform analysis on the application's source code without executing/running the code on a platform. In other words, a bot goes line by line of source code to find any bug defined by preconfigured policies/rules. It could be compared to manual code review, but the review is done by a bot. Mostly, code quality, coding standard aspects are targeted to be scanned. The biggest name in static code analysis... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Review of Java Static Analysis Tools
    FindBugs looks for bugs in Java Code, and this means over 400 different bugs. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 11 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FindBugs and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Pmd - PMD scans Java source code and looks for potential problems like:

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Loading...