Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Make VS Codeship

Compare GNU Make VS Codeship and see what are their differences

GoToMyPC
Remotely access your computer from anywhere on any device! Discover productivity and flexibility with GoToMyPC remote desktop software. Try it Free! featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Codeship videos

+ Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and Codeship)

GNU Make

Codeship

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GNU Make and Codeship

GNU Make Reviews

We have no reviews of GNU Make yet.
Be the first one to post

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
Source: solutionsuggest.com
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Loading...