Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Emacs VS Textastic

Compare GNU Emacs VS Textastic and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GNU Emacs logo GNU Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more.

Textastic logo Textastic

Textastic is a text, code, and markup editor for iPad and iPhone with support for syntax highlighting, FTP, SFTP, and Dropbox.
  • GNU Emacs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-19
  • Textastic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-17

GNU Emacs features and specs

  • Highly Extensible
    GNU Emacs is highly customizable, allowing users to configure nearly every aspect using Emacs Lisp. This makes it remarkably adaptable for various workflows.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    There is a wide array of plugins available for Emacs, extending its functionality for programming, text editing, project management, and more.
  • Versatile
    Aside from text editing, Emacs can function as an email client, web browser, terminal emulator, and more, making it a powerful multi-purpose tool.
  • Free and Open Source
    GNU Emacs is free to use and modify, with source code available under the GNU General Public License, encouraging collaborative improvement and transparency.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Emacs runs on many different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and various Unix-like systems, ensuring a wide reach and consistent experience across platforms.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Emacs

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its vast array of features and unique keybindings, new users often find Emacs difficult to learn initially.
  • Performance
    Emacs can be slower compared to more lightweight text editors, especially when heavily customized or handling large files.
  • Keyboard-Centric Interface
    Emacs relies heavily on keyboard shortcuts, which can be overwhelming and complex, leading to potential finger strain from extensive use.
  • Complex Configuration
    While its customizability is a strength, configuring Emacs to fit personal needs can be time-consuming and complex, requiring knowledge of Emacs Lisp.

Textastic features and specs

  • Wide Language Support
    Textastic supports syntax highlighting for more than 80 programming languages including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Python, and PHP, making it versatile for diverse coding needs.
  • iOS Compatibility
    Designed specifically for Apple's ecosystem, Textastic offers a seamless coding experience on iPad and iPhone, providing portability and ease of use on mobile devices.
  • FTP and SFTP Integration
    Textastic allows users to connect to FTP, SFTP, and WebDAV servers, facilitating easy file uploads and downloads directly from within the app.
  • Code Auto-completion
    The app provides auto-completion features for various languages, enhancing productivity by reducing typing time for developers.
  • Customizable Themes
    Textastic allows customization of the editor’s appearance with themes, giving users the ability to create a comfortable visual environment for coding.

Possible disadvantages of Textastic

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more robust IDEs, Textastic lacks some advanced features such as integrated debugging tools and built-in support for version control systems like Git.
  • No Cross-Platform Availability
    Textastic is only available for iOS and macOS, limiting its use to Apple's platforms and restricting cross-platform workflows.
  • Paid Application
    Unlike some other text editors and IDEs that are free, Textastic requires a purchase, which might not be ideal for users looking for free coding solutions.
  • Learning Curve for Beginners
    While not overly complex, new users or beginner programmers might find it challenging to fully utilize all features due to a lack of in-depth tutorials.
  • Dependency on Apple Ecosystem
    Being a product tailored for Apple's ecosystem, it doesn’t cater to users on other platforms, limiting collaborative and cross-device coding experiences outside Apple devices.

Analysis of GNU Emacs

Overall verdict

  • GNU Emacs is widely considered to be a powerful and versatile text editor, especially among programmers and developers.

Why this product is good

  • Highly Customizable: Emacs can be extensively customized with Emacs Lisp, enabling users to tailor the editor to fit their specific workflow.
  • Rich Ecosystem: There is a large variety of plug-ins and extensions available, which can transform it into much more than just a text editor.
  • Built-in Tools: Emacs includes numerous built-in tools such as a debugger, calendar, email client, and file manager, making it a comprehensive development environment.
  • Cross-Platform: Emacs runs on multiple platforms, which makes it accessible to a broad audience.

Recommended for

  • Programmers and developers who appreciate a customizable and extensible tool.
  • Users who want to integrate various development tools into a single environment.
  • Individuals comfortable with learning Emacs Lisp to create and understand custom scripts and configurations.
  • People interested in a text editor that has a strong and supportive community.

GNU Emacs videos

+ Add

Switching to GNU Emacs

Textastic videos

+ Add

Textastic Mac & iOS Review

More videos:

  • Review - Textastic Review 2
  • Review - Textastic Code Editor - iPad App Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Emacs and Textastic)

GNU Emacs

Textastic

Text Editors
87 87%
Text Editors
13% 13
IDE
86 86%
IDE
14% 14
IDEs And Text Editors
92 92%
IDEs And Text Editors
8% 8
Software Development
76 76%
Software Development
24% 24

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Emacs and Textastic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GNU Emacs and Textastic

GNU Emacs Reviews

14 BEST LaTeX Editor for Mac & Windows in 2022
Emacs is a Unix based text editor tool which is used by programmers, engineers, students, and system administrators. It is one of the best LaTeX editor for Mac that allows you to add, modify, delete, insert, words, letters, lines, and other units of text.
Source: www.guru99.com
The Top 7 Notepad++ Alternatives for You
Emacs has been around in its various forms since 1976 and is another very worthy Notepad++ alternative. When I first started using Emacs I have to admit that I didn’t find it the easiest to use. But once I got used to it I realized just how powerful Emacs is for the programming community.
Source: www.technize.com
10 Best Notepad++ Alternatives in 2020
Emacs is a Unix based text editor tool which is used by programmers, engineers, students, and system administrators. It allows you to add, modify, delete, insert, words, letters, lines, and other units of text.
Source: www.guru99.com
7 open source alternatives to Dreamweaver
Vim or Emacs. Without participating in the holy war between these two traditional text editors, I can safely say that there are a number of enhancements for web editing available for both. So if you're already a terminal junkie, take your pick. Or, if those don't satisfy, try one of these Emacs/Vim alternatives.
Source: opensource.com
10 Best Sublime Text Alternatives in 2019
Emacs is a Unix based text editor tool which is used by programmers, engineers, students, and system administrators. It allows you to add, modify, delete, insert, words, letters, lines, and other units of text.
Source: www.guru99.com

Textastic Reviews

We have no reviews of Textastic yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GNU Emacs should be more popular than Textastic. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Emacs mentions (6)

  • Emacs daemon as sytemd service in debian 12 (gnome)
    Cat .config/systemd/user/default.target.wants/emacs.service [Unit] Description=Emacs text editor Documentation=info:emacs man:emacs(1) https://gnu.org/software/emacs/ [Service] Type=notify ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/emacs --fg-daemon # Emacs will exit with status 15 after having received SIGTERM, which # is the default "KillSignal" value systemd uses to stop services. SuccessExitStatus=15 # The location of the... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Why does emacs exec path variable not just copy the users path variable?
    ## If your Emacs is installed in a non-standard location, you may need ## to copy this file to a standard directory, eg ~/.config/systemd/user/ . ## If you install this file by hand, change the "Exec" lines below ## to use absolute file names for the executables. [Unit] Description=Emacs text editor Documentation=info:emacs man:emacs(1)... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Hi DM's, what medium do you use to organise your campaign?
    For gathering notes, writing and organizing, Org-Roam which implies Org and Emacs. Source: over 2 years ago
  • This Guy is getting out of control at this point.
    I was heading to gnu.org/software/emacs to prove my point and it said:. Source: over 3 years ago
  • opam doesn't see emacs?
    <><> Version-specific details <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> 🐫 Version 1 Repository default Homepage: "http://gnu.org/software/emacs" Bug-reports: "https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/issues" Authors: "anil@recoil.org" Maintainer: "anil@recoil.org" License: "GPL-1.0-or-later" Flags: conf Synopsis Virtual package to install the Emacs editor Description This... Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Textastic mentions (1)

  • Top 5 text editors for mobile in India 2021
    Textastic is a very popular text editor on IOS devices and it is from Alexander Blach. This text editor is has a lot of features and it supports more than 80 programming and markup languages including C++, C#, JavaScript, PHP, PERL, Java, HTML, CSS, XML, MARKDOWN, Objective-C, Swift, SQL, Python, Shell scripts etc for full list you can visit their website, you can connect your FTP, SFTP, SSH and WEBDAV servers to... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Emacs and Textastic, you can also consider the following products

VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

Vim - Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing

Buffer Editor - Buffer Editor is a POWERFUL code and text editor that lets you easily develop software, review code...

Microsoft Visual Studio - Microsoft Visual Studio is an integrated development environment (IDE) from Microsoft.

Codeanywhere - Codeanywhere is a complete toolset for web development. Enabling you to edit, collaborate and run your projects from any device.

Loading...