Gmail Go VS Gmail

Gmail Go Reviews

Gmail Reviews

1. marksachintha    

   CEO at ShiftX | 11 months ago
   Best Email Service I have ever used.

   🏁 Competitors: Slack, Microsoft Outlook, Mattermost

   👍 Pros:    No need email hosting|Can create groups/channels like slack

   👎 Cons:    Doesn't work with outlook
2. Phil_is_ill01    

   over 3 years ago
   Great user interface, and ease of use. Not sure about the privacy though.

   Very happy with its offers, it has a full suite of tools. Also the user experience is great. I am not sure about the privacy though. I am not confident enough to use it for sending and receiving confidential documents.

   🏁 Competitors: Mailfence, ProtonMail

   👍 Pros:    Huge storage space|Mobile app|Easy to use|Organisation

   👎 Cons:    Security|Privacy|Data protection and security
3. Marta Garcia    

   about 4 years ago
   Not good mail in terms of privacy and security

   I used to use Gmail until 4 months ago. I was really happy with this mail, it is easy to handle and, being a Google member, there are many tools available to use. However, I started to learn about the security and privacy offered by Google, which is NONE. We are selling our information and personal data to a technological giant and, many times, we are not even aware of it.

   This is why I deleted all but one of my Google-related accounts. As most people are still not aware of this, when working or contacting certain people for the first time, it is essential to do it through Gmail.

   Today, there are a few alternatives to solve this lack of privacy. After doing an intensive search and reading comments, I decided to get an account with Mailfence and, honestly, I'm very happy with their service. It's an easy to use email, with end-to-end encryption, digital signatures, calendar, document saving capabilities, ... I really recommend it for all those who are starting in the world of privacy and security. The best thing is that you can create a free account and, if you are happy with the service or need more storage space, you can switch to a paid account.

   I hope my opinion helps everyone, especially those who are thinking about whether it is really worth giving all our information in exchange for a free email.

   🏁 Competitors: Mailfence

Gmail Go mentions (14)

• The art of conditional rendering: Tips and tricks for React and Next.js developers

  For example, to experience conditional routing in action, try navigating to https://mail.google.com/mail in a new incognito window. When you do, you'll be redirected to the Google sign-in page. That's conditional routing working behind the scenes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Gmail is showing ads in the middle of the inbox

  If you're ok with html-only, enjoy a throwback: https://mail.google.com/mail?ui=html. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• My daughter's school took over my personal Microsoft account

  If you're bookmarking, you can edit the URL and use `?authuser=foo@bar.com` instead. So instead of: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/#starred bookmark: https://mail.google.com/mail/?authuser=foo@bar.com#starred The URL will be immediately rewritten as the proper /u/# for that user (which, as you say, depends on login order). Not sure why it's like this, but I could see it being related to not wanting PII in the URL. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Technical SEO pop quiz. Who can tell me why this is happening to gmail? (image in post)

  Depends what you search. Some are https like if you search for "gmail", the link is https://mail.google.com/mail/ and has the same issue. Source: over 1 year ago

• Smart Move, Google

  Sure, this is what that Wikipedia page says: > As of 22 June 2005, Gmail's canonical URI changed from http://gmail.google.com/gmail/ to http://mail.google.com/mail/.[17] As of November 2015, those who typed in the former URI were redirected to the latter. As you can see from your own source, the canonical URL has always been under google.com, not under gmail.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Gmail mentions (0)