Glyph static site generator VS Nikola

Shameless plug incoming. A good while ago I created my own "system" Glyph: https://github.com/dbriemann/glyph It's a static site generator utilizing Github issues and Github pages. If you are interested in how it works see: https://github.com/dbriemann/glyph-zero As an example you can see a raw blog entry here: https://github.com/dbriemann/blog/issues/7 which results in... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

Nikola is a feature-rich static site generator that supports a variety of formats for content creation, including reStructuredText, Markdown, and Jupyter Notebooks. It offers a flexible architecture, allowing you to use different template engines and supports plugins for extending functionality. Nikola is suitable for both simple blogs and complex websites. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

You can - you'd basically just create a python script that parses your HTML/CSS files and replaces strings with values from your YAML. However I wouldn't recommend that unless you're just using this as an opportunity to learn Python. If you want to standup a real site and you want to use python, I'd recommend a Python static site generator like Pelican or Nikola. Source: over 1 year ago

I tend to prefer static site generators for this kind of use case. I use Nikola, which is written in and based on Python. You should be able to pick whatever html5up template you like and turn it into a Nikola template, too. Source: almost 2 years ago

Or writing your own Caddy-module that does exactly that? [0] https://getnikola.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I switched to Nikola recently: https://getnikola.com/ Reads every kind of plaintext format, but will also just publish a Jupyter notebook which means you can do drag and drop image and graph inlining which makes everything so much simpler (and thus makes me more likely to keep it up). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago