Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GlusterFS VS wZD

Compare GlusterFS VS wZD and see what are their differences

Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

wZD logo wZD

wZD is a powerful storage server, designed for big data storage systems with small and large files...
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • wZD Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-24

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

wZD features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

GlusterFS videos

+ Add

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

wZD videos

+ Add

WZD Review Suksawadplywood x Furfunny 02

More videos:

  • Review - (NEW PACK!) WZD Gaming Texture Pack V2 (REVIEW!)
  • Review - Model# WZD The Wizard

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and wZD)

GlusterFS

wZD

Cloud Storage
93 93%
Cloud Storage
7% 7
Cloud Computing
93 93%
Cloud Computing
7% 7
Object Storage
69 69%
Object Storage
31% 31
Storage
100 100%
Storage
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and wZD. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 4 years ago

wZD mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of wZD yet. Tracking of wZD recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and wZD, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

HighContext - Development

rkt - App Container runtime

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Seaweed FS - SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…

Loading...