Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GlusterFS VS simplyblock

Compare GlusterFS VS simplyblock and see what are their differences

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

simplyblock logo simplyblock

Simplyblock provides cloud block storage for IO-intensive workloads running in Kubernetes, including databases, OLTP, analytics solutions and file systems. Leveraging AWS infrastructure, the software ensures predictable latency, scalability and sig
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
Not present

Simplyblock is the first company to build a container storage system for Kubernetes, specifically designed for latency-sensitive, IO-intensive, cloud-native stateful workloads, such as databases, analytics, crypto / blockchain, document storages, and others.

A fully distributed storage solution, built upon our VASH™ technology, offering seamless scalability without downtimes, and is highly optimized for AWS NVMe® (io1/2) and gp3 volumes.

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

simplyblock features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    SimplyBlock offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users in blockchain technology.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to handle a large number of transactions without significant slowdowns, which is essential for businesses that anticipate growth.
  • Security Features
    SimplyBlock provides robust security protocols to ensure the safety and integrity of data and transactions processed on the platform.
  • Customization Options
    Users can tailor the platform to their specific needs, which can enhance functionality and performance for different use cases.
  • Support and Resources
    The platform offers comprehensive support and learning resources, helping users troubleshoot problems and improve their understanding of the system.

Possible disadvantages of simplyblock

  • Cost
    Depending on the extent of customization and use, SimplyBlock may prove costly, especially for startups or smaller enterprises working with limited budgets.
  • Integration Complexity
    Integrating SimplyBlock with existing systems and applications can be complex and time-consuming, possibly requiring specialized technical expertise.
  • Dependence on Internet Connectivity
    As a cloud-based solution, SimplyBlock requires constant internet connectivity, which can be a limitation in areas with unstable internet access.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, understanding and effectively utilizing all features of SimplyBlock can still present a learning challenge for some users.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    SimplyBlock's capabilities are reduced or unavailable offline, which can be a drawback for users needing access in remote or disconnected locations.

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

simplyblock videos

No simplyblock videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and simplyblock)
Cloud Storage
87 87%
13% 13
Cloud Computing
88 88%
12% 12
Storage
82 82%
18% 18
Object Storage
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and simplyblock. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GlusterFS and simplyblock

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

simplyblock Reviews

Simplyblock as alternative to Ceph: A Comprehensive Comparison
Cost/Performance and Performance Density: Simplyblock outperforms Ceph in terms of cost/performance and performance density. While Ceph has average access latencies rarely dropping below 3 ms and an average of about 2,000 IOPS/CPU-core without compression, encryption, deduplication or other data services turned on. That limits the performance density to about 100.000 IOPS...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 4 years ago

simplyblock mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of simplyblock yet. Tracking of simplyblock recommendations started around Sep 2023.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and simplyblock, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

StorPool - StorPool is designed from the ground up to provide cloud builders, shared hosting providers and MSPs with the most resource efficient storage software on the market.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

rkt - App Container runtime

BeeGFS -   Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

Seaweed FS - SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…