Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GlusterFS VS OpenMediaVault

Compare GlusterFS VS OpenMediaVault and see what are their differences

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

OpenMediaVault logo OpenMediaVault

OpenMediaVault is the next generation network attached storage (NAS) solution based on Debian Linux.
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • OpenMediaVault Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-27

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

OpenMediaVault features and specs

  • Open Source
    OpenMediaVault is free to use and customize, thanks to its open-source nature. This allows users to modify and extend the software to better suit their needs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    OpenMediaVault offers a simple web-based interface that makes it easy for users of all skill levels to set up and manage their storage solutions.
  • Plugin Support
    The platform supports a wide range of plugins, enabling users to add additional functionalities like media servers, backup solutions, and more.
  • Regular Updates
    The community and developers frequently update the software, ensuring it stays current with new features and security patches.
  • Wide Hardware Compatibility
    OpenMediaVault is compatible with a wide range of hardware, from low-powered single-board computers like the Raspberry Pi to more robust server setups.
  • Community Support
    There is a strong community around OpenMediaVault that provides support, shares guides, and develops plugins to extend its functionality.

Possible disadvantages of OpenMediaVault

  • Limited Enterprise Features
    OpenMediaVault may lack some advanced features and scalability options found in commercial NAS solutions, making it less suitable for very large enterprises.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    While the user interface is straightforward, initial setup and configuration can be complex for users unfamiliar with NAS systems.
  • Reliance on Plugins
    Many advanced features require third-party plugins. If these plugins are not well-maintained, it can lead to stability and compatibility issues.
  • Performance Overhead
    Being a software-based solution, OpenMediaVault can introduce some performance overhead compared to hardware-based NAS appliances.
  • Less Robust Technical Support
    Unlike commercial solutions, OpenMediaVault relies primarily on community support and forums, which may not always provide timely or comprehensive assistance.
  • Limited Mobile App Support
    There is limited support for official mobile apps, which might be inconvenient for users who want to manage their NAS on the go.

Analysis of OpenMediaVault

Overall verdict

  • OpenMediaVault is considered a good choice for users looking for a cost-effective and flexible NAS solution. Its open-source nature, combined with a powerful feature set and intuitive user experience, makes it suitable for different levels of technical expertise.

Why this product is good

  • OpenMediaVault is a popular open-source network-attached storage (NAS) solution designed for home users and small businesses. It is praised for its ease of installation, user-friendly web interface, and robust set of features. The platform supports a wide range of services such as SSH, (S)FTP, SMB/CIFS, DAAP media server, RSync, and more. Additionally, it allows for extensive customization through plugins and has an active community for support.

Recommended for

    Home users, small businesses, and tech enthusiasts who want a customizable and budget-friendly NAS solution without compromising on features.

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

OpenMediaVault videos

Freenas vs Openmediavault: Battle of the NAS Titans

More videos:

  • Review - OpenMediaVault NAS Linux Distro Review
  • Review - OpenMediaVault Network-Attached Storage (NAS) Solution

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and OpenMediaVault)
Cloud Storage
40 40%
60% 60
Cloud Computing
37 37%
63% 63
Storage
37 37%
63% 63
Object Storage
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and OpenMediaVault. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GlusterFS and OpenMediaVault

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

OpenMediaVault Reviews

9 Of The Best FreeNAS Alternatives For Your Storage Needs
Openmediavault is maybe the best FreeNAS alternatives in the market as of now. This comes with an appended capacity (NAS) arrangement. It works on Linux, and you can also use some powerful administrations like DAAP media servers.
Top 7 FreeNas Alternative For Your PC
Openmediavault is one highly advanced and next-generation NAS solution based on Debian Linux. This platform was designed mainly for small offices and homes and offers a simple GUI solution to manage NAS storage hardware. This has many services such as SMB/CIFS, FTP, SSH, DAAP media server, BitTorrent, RSync, etc. This software has a modular design and is made advanced with...
Top 15 Best TrueNAS Alternatives In 2022
The most notable characteristics of OpenMediaVault include its ability to operate right out of the box, web-based administration volume control, file sharing, including aggregation, email notification, and extensibility via a plugin, among others. This is another truenas alternative.
15 FreeNAS Alternatives 2020 | Best Storage Operating System
Known as the best alternatives to FreeNAS, OpenMediaVault is a free next-generation NAS solution based on Debian Linux. It contains administrations such as NFS (v3/v4), DAAP, SSH, (S)FTP, SMB/CIFS media servers, RSync, BitTorrent clients, etc. OpenMediaVault is simple, stable, comprehensive, and does not necessitate expertise to install and administrate.
10 Best FreeNas alternatives in 2020
Openmediavault is one of the most popular FreeNas alternative you can have a try. It is the cutting edge organize appended capacity (NAS) arrangement dependent on Debian Linux. It contains administrations like SSH, (S)FTP, SMB/CIFS, DAAP media server, RSync, BitTorrent customer and some more. Openmediavault is principally intended to be utilized in little workplaces, or home...
Source: omy9.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenMediaVault should be more popular than GlusterFS. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 4 years ago

OpenMediaVault mentions (10)

  • Windows to Linux Switch
    I'm using openmediavault.org for my "NAS" OS. No desktop, but it does have a good web-based GUI. To automount your NAS drive, you'd have to modify your fstab file. Lots of good tutorials online. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Thinking about making a home storage server
    Basically, there a few options to start with. The most decent ones are TrueNAS/FreeNAS (https://www.truenas.com/) , OMV (openmediavault.org), both supports zfs. Also, you can look into UnRAID (https://unraid.net/) which allows you to scale easily. Also, some info on zfs https://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/hardware/10-reasons-why-zfs-rocks/ https://www.starwindsoftware.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-zfs. Source: over 2 years ago
  • just how well does the nvidea shield pro do as a plex server?
    I have 5 Optiplex 3010's (i3-3rd Gen processors) sitting in my closet with 4GB RAM that would work just fine as a direct play Plex server with openmediavault as it's OS. And should even HW Transcode a couple of 1080p files with a Plex Pass. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How I reclaimed my server after resetting devices after the breach (Ubuntu)
    Wow, I'm on a Debian based headloess OS (openmediavault.org) and my update was much easier. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • No write access after clean install of Linux Mint
    The link that u/Fribbtastic had quite a bit of detail. Or there is always r/linux4noobs. I don't have mine installed on Mint and the GUI of my openmediavault.org OS is quite a bit different (I.e. There is no desktop, only a web interface/command line). But the command line should be the same for all distros built off of Debian. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and OpenMediaVault, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

TrueNAS Core - TrueNAS Core (formerly FreeNAS) is a storage operating system strong and robust enough to meet the needs of enterprise level businesses.

rkt - App Container runtime

Rockstor - Rockstor is a free and open source NAS (Network Attached Storage) operating system.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

XigmaNAS - File Sharing, OS & Utilities, and Security & Privacy