Software Alternatives & Reviews

GlusterFS VS LizardFS

Compare GlusterFS VS LizardFS and see what are their differences

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

LizardFS logo LizardFS

LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system.
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • LizardFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

LizardFS videos

A look at MooseFS and LizardFS distributed file systems

More videos:

  • Review - LizardFS Intro
  • Tutorial - LizardFS and OpenNebula, a petabyte cloud the simple way How to move OpenNebula into the Petabyte s…

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and LizardFS)
Cloud Storage
80 80%
20% 20
Storage
76 76%
24% 24
Cloud Computing
81 81%
19% 19
Object Storage
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and LizardFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GlusterFS and LizardFS

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

LizardFS Reviews

Ceph Storage Platform Alternatives in 2022
LizardFS, Software Defined Storage is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant, and highly available file system. It allows combining disk space located on several servers into a single namespace visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. LizardFS was inspired by the GoogleFS distributed file system that was introduced in 2010.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS should be more popular than LizardFS. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 3 years ago

LizardFS mentions (1)

  • Had to add a second sata card and upgrade to a 1600 watt power supply because spinning up 17 drives was too much for my poor 900 watt...
    That's a lotta eggs to put in one basket. I started using LizardFS for mass storage and it basically allows me to grow/shrink easily. https://lizardfs.com/. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and LizardFS, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

BeeGFS -   Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

rkt - App Container runtime

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Seaweed FS - SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…