Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GlusterFS VS ArangoDB

Compare GlusterFS VS ArangoDB and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

ArangoDB logo ArangoDB

A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • ArangoDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-20

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

ArangoDB features and specs

  • Graph DB

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

ArangoDB videos

ArangoDB and Foxx Framework, deeper dive. WHILT#17

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and ArangoDB)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and ArangoDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GlusterFS and ArangoDB

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

ArangoDB Reviews

9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
ArangoDB is a native multi-model DBMS system. It supports three data models with one database core and a unified query language AQL. Its query language is declarative which helps you to compare different data access patterns by using a single query.
Source: www.guru99.com
Top 15 Free Graph Databases
ArangoDB is a distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions. ArangoDB
ArangoDB vs Neo4j - What you can't do with Neo4j
Scalability needs and ArangoDB ArangoDB is cluster ready for graphs, documents and key/values. ArangoDB is suitable for e.g. recommendation engines, personalization, Knowledge Graphs or other graph-related use cases. ArangoDB provides special features for scale-up (Vertex-centric indices) and scale-out (SmartGraphs).

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ArangoDB should be more popular than GlusterFS. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 4 years ago

ArangoDB mentions (6)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and ArangoDB, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

rkt - App Container runtime

neo4j - Meet Neo4j: The graph database platform powering today's mission-critical enterprise applications, including artificial intelligence, fraud detection and recommendations.