Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GlusterFS VS Apache HBase

Compare GlusterFS VS Apache HBase and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Apache HBase logo Apache HBase

Apache HBase – Apache HBase™ Home
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • Apache HBase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

Apache HBase features and specs

  • Scalability
    HBase is designed to scale horizontally, allowing it to handle large amounts of data by adding more nodes. This makes it suitable for applications requiring high write and read throughput.
  • Consistency
    It provides strong consistency for reads and writes, which ensures that any read will return the most recently written value. This is crucial for applications where data accuracy is essential.
  • Integration with Hadoop Ecosystem
    HBase integrates seamlessly with Hadoop and other components like Apache Hive and Apache Pig, making it a suitable choice for big data processing tasks.
  • Random Read/Write Access
    Unlike HDFS, HBase supports random, real-time read/write access to large datasets, making it ideal for applications that need frequent data updates.
  • Schema Flexibility
    HBase provides a flexible schema model that allows changes on demand without major disruptions, supporting dynamic and evolving data models.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HBase

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing HBase can be complex and may require expert knowledge, especially for tuning and optimizing performance in large-scale deployments.
  • High Latency for Small Queries
    While HBase is designed for large-scale data, small queries can suffer from higher latency due to the overhead of its distributed nature.
  • Sparse Documentation
    Despite being widely used, HBase documentation and community support can sometimes be lacking, making issue resolution difficult for new users.
  • Dependency on Hadoop
    Since HBase depends heavily on the Hadoop ecosystem, issues or limitations with Hadoop components can affect HBase’s performance and functionality.
  • Limited Transaction Support
    HBase lacks full ACID transaction support, which can be a limitation for applications needing complex transactional processing.

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Apache HBase videos

Apache HBase 101: How HBase Can Help You Build Scalable, Distributed Java Applications

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and Apache HBase)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and Apache HBase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HBase should be more popular than GlusterFS. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: about 4 years ago

Apache HBase mentions (8)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and Apache HBase, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Apache Ambari - Ambari is aimed at making Hadoop management simpler by developing software for provisioning, managing, and monitoring Hadoop clusters.

rkt - App Container runtime

Apache Pig - Pig is a high-level platform for creating MapReduce programs used with Hadoop.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Apache Cassandra - The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.