Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GitlabRunner VS Cicada.build

Compare GitlabRunner VS Cicada.build and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

GitlabRunner logo GitlabRunner

Speed up your CI/CD pipeline

Cicada.build logo Cicada.build

Build CI/CD pipelines in TypeScript and run them anywhere.
  • GitlabRunner Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-03-10
  • Cicada.build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08

GitlabRunner features and specs

  • Integration with GitLab
    GitLab Runner integrates seamlessly with GitLab CI/CD, providing a smooth experience for managing and deploying builds directly from your repositories.
  • Multiple Executor Types
    GitLab Runner supports various executors like Docker, Shell, VirtualBox, Parallels, SSH, and Kubernetes, allowing flexibility in running builds in different environments.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GitLab Runner allows for complete transparency, the ability to customize or extend functionalities, and does not incur licensing costs.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    GitLab Runner can be installed on multiple platforms, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, offering versatility in build server setup.
  • Autoscaling
    With native support for autoscaling on cloud platforms, GitLab Runner can scale resources up or down, optimizing cost and performance based on demand.

Possible disadvantages of GitlabRunner

  • Complex Setup for Large Projects
    Configuring GitLab Runner for large and complex projects can be challenging, often requiring significant DevOps expertise to optimize the pipeline and runners efficiently.
  • Resource Management
    Managing resources effectively can be complex, especially when dealing with shared runners, which might lead to resource contention or inefficient builds.
  • Limited Community Support
    While GitLab Runner is open source, its community and third-party support might not be as extensive as other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Lack of Plugins
    Compared to other CI/CD systems, GitLab Runner has fewer third-party plugins, which might require custom scripts or workarounds to achieve specific functionalities.
  • Dependency on GitLab
    The tight integration means that GitLab Runner is heavily reliant on GitLab, limiting its use in environments where GitLab is not the primary version control system.

Cicada.build features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitlabRunner and Cicada.build)

GitlabRunner

Cicada.build

Developer Tools
49 49%
Developer Tools
51% 51
Continuous Integration
57 57%
Continuous Integration
43% 43
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Productivity
43 43%
Productivity
57% 57

User comments

Share your experience with using GitlabRunner and Cicada.build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitlabRunner and Cicada.build, you can also consider the following products

Buddy - The simplest CI/CD tool ever made, acclaimed by top developers worldwide. It uses delivery pipelines to build, test and deploy software. Pipelines are created with over 100 ready-to-use actions, that can be arranged in any way.

SaaS Starter Kit - A starter template with Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD and more

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Cimon by Cycode - Runtime Security Solution for CI/CD Pipelines

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.

R2Devops Hub - Create powerful CI/CD pipelines, easily

Loading...