Community-Driven Upgrades: Increased integration of real-time community feedback via platforms such as GitHub Sponsors and social media channels (e.g., Twitter (@fsf)) could drive iterative improvements in the license. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

Chad has been leading the Open Source Pledge, a simple framework to get companies to fund the projects they rely on. The idea is straightforward: for every developer your company employs, allocate $2,000 per year to open source. Distribute those funds however you want—GitHub Sponsors, Open Collective, Thanks.dev, direct payments, etc. The only other ask is to publish a blog post showing what you did. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago

Abstract: This post dives into the evolution and global expansion of GitHub Sponsors and its impact on funding open-source projects. We examine its inception, supported countries, technical challenges, and how blockchain innovations and alternative funding models are shaping the future of open source development. From core benefits and practical use cases to potential hurdles and forward-looking trends, this... - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago

This post explores the critical issue of sustainable funding for open source projects. We dive into historical challenges, innovative funding strategies, and future trends that aim to support the collaborative spirit of open source development. Using examples from corporate sponsorships, non-profit foundations, crowdfunding methods, subscription models, government grants, and commercialization, the article... - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago

This comprehensive guide explores GitHub Sponsors and its role in sustaining the open source ecosystem. We delve into the evolution of open source funding, detail core concepts such as tiered sponsorship, blockchain integration, NFTs, and tokenization, and discuss practical use cases, challenges, and future trends. By blending technical insights with real-world examples and authoritative references like GitHub... - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago

When I started with https://emailengine.app, a similar product, I also considered releasing it as a SaaS. But looking at the competition, it seemed too complicated for me (just look at the compliance list for Nylas Email API https://www.nylas.com/security/#compliance ). Will be interesting to see how it works out for you. Good luck! - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Oh, yeah, I forgot my pitch. The link is https://emailengine.app - EnailEngine acts as a mail client, basically the same way Thunderbird runs on desktop, or the iPhone Mail on phone, but instead of a GUI it has REST API and instead of desktop notifications it sends JSON webhooks. And instead of a single email account, it can manage thousands of accounts. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Well, I for one, hope that email stays as complicated as described in the post. Otherwise my project that simplifies access to email accounts (https://emailengine.app) would get no traction :D. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I'd like to know if anyone here can share some experience using https://emailengine.app in a larger environment, e.g. Managing / watching 100-200 email accounts and processing ~50.000-100.000 mails per day? Source: over 2 years ago

I had the same issues when I started with https://emailengine.app - just like Ghost, it’s an app written in Nodejs. I tried multiple distribution options at first and finally went with complete self containment. All modules are pre-installed during the publishing step and thus the user never needs to run npm. Or if you download the “compiled” single binary version you don’t even need node as it’s bundled with the... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago