Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GitHub Pages VS WebPagetest

Compare GitHub Pages VS WebPagetest and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GitHub Pages logo GitHub Pages

A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

WebPagetest logo WebPagetest

Run a free website speed test from multiple locations around the globe using real browsers...
  • GitHub Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-19
  • WebPagetest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-05

GitHub Pages features and specs

  • Free Hosting
    GitHub Pages provides free hosting for static websites, making it an economical choice given no cost is involved.
  • Easy Integration with GitHub
    Direct integration with GitHub repositories allows for seamless deployment directly from a repository’s branches.
  • Custom Domains
    Users can use their own custom domains, providing greater control over their site's branding and URL structure.
  • Jekyll Integration
    Built-in support for Jekyll, a popular static site generator, allows for easy creation and management of content.
  • Version Control
    Since your website's source code is hosted on GitHub, you can use Git version control to manage changes and collaborate with others.
  • SSL for Custom Domains
    Free SSL certificates provided for custom domains enhance security and improve SEO performance for your website.
  • GitHub Actions
    Integration with GitHub Actions allows for advanced CI/CD workflows, automating the process of testing and deploying updates.
  • Community and Documentation
    Extensive documentation and a large community make it easier to troubleshoot issues and find examples or guides.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Pages

  • Static Site Limitations
    GitHub Pages only supports the hosting of static content, which means no support for server-side scripting or dynamic content.
  • Resource Limitations
    Imposed restrictions on bandwidth and storage may not be suitable for high-traffic or large-scale websites.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration, especially when dealing with custom domains or SSL, can be complex for beginners.
  • Limited Customization Options
    While Jekyll is powerful, there are still limitations in terms of plugins and customization compared to more robust CMS solutions.
  • No Backend Support
    Inability to run backend processes or databases means that dynamic applications requiring real-time data and complex backend logic cannot be hosted.
  • Corporate Restrictions
    Enterprises or organizations with strict security or compliance policies may find GitHub Pages insufficient for their needs.
  • Dependent on GitHub
    Reliance on GitHub's platform means that any downtime or outages on GitHub can directly affect the availability of your website.

WebPagetest features and specs

  • Detailed Performance Metrics
    WebPagetest provides extensive performance metrics, including Time to First Byte (TTFB), Speed Index, and First Contentful Paint, allowing for a deep understanding of website performance.
  • Real Browsers
    Tests are conducted using real browsers, which ensures that the results are closely aligned with real user experiences.
  • Geolocation Testing
    Supports testing from various locations worldwide, which is useful for understanding performance in different markets.
  • Advanced Testing Options
    Offers advanced options such as scripting for complex interactions, multi-step transactions, and authenticating users.
  • Free and Open Source
    WebPagetest is free to use and its code is open-source, allowing for community contributions and customizable implementations.
  • Video Capture
    Provides video capture of the loading process, giving a visual representation of loading performance.
  • Waterfall Charts
    Generates detailed waterfall charts that help identify bottlenecks in resource loading.

Possible disadvantages of WebPagetest

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive options and detailed metrics may be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with web performance testing.
  • Intermittent Performance
    As a free service, sometimes the performance can be inconsistent due to high demand or limited resources.
  • Dated Interface
    The user interface of the website is somewhat dated and could benefit from modernization to improve user experience.
  • Limited Instant Support
    Lack of immediate support options can be a downside; users often have to rely on forums and community support.
  • Potential for Inconsistent Results
    Results might vary between tests due to variability in internet speed, server conditions, and other external factors.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Advanced testing options require a significant amount of configuration, which can be time-consuming.

Analysis of GitHub Pages

Overall verdict

  • Yes, GitHub Pages is a good option for hosting static websites, especially for those who are already familiar with GitHub. It provides a straightforward, reliable, and cost-effective solution for many small to medium-sized projects.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub Pages is a popular choice for hosting static websites because it's directly integrated with GitHub, making deployment seamless and efficient. It supports custom domain configurations, offers free hosting, and automatically integrates with GitHub's version control system. These features make it particularly appealing for developers looking for a simple and effective way to host project sites or personal blogs.

Recommended for

  • Developers and tech-savvy users who are comfortable with Git and GitHub.
  • Individuals or organizations looking to host static sites, such as blogs or project documentation.
  • Users interested in a free hosting solution with easy Version Control System (VCS) integration.
  • Open-source project maintainers who want to provide project documentation or demos.

Analysis of WebPagetest

Overall verdict

  • Yes, WebPagetest is considered a good tool for evaluating website performance. It is widely used by developers and performance engineers for its accuracy and the depth of information it provides.

Why this product is good

  • WebPagetest is highly regarded for its detailed performance analysis capabilities, offering in-depth insights into page speed and other performance metrics. It allows users to run tests from multiple locations, on various devices and browsers, which is crucial for assessing a website's performance under different conditions. The tool provides a comprehensive waterfall chart and numerous other diagnostic features that help identify performance bottlenecks and potential optimization areas.

Recommended for

    WebPagetest is recommended for web developers, performance engineers, SEO specialists, and anyone interested in optimizing website speed and performance. It is especially useful for those who need detailed insights into page load processes and performance optimization opportunities.

GitHub Pages videos

+ Add

Intro to GitHub Pages

More videos:

  • Review - What is GitHub Pages?
  • Tutorial - How to Setup GitHub Pages (2020) | Data Science Portfolio

WebPagetest videos

+ Add

WebPageTest - The State of the Web

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use WebPageTest.org - For Beginners

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Pages and WebPagetest)

GitHub Pages

WebPagetest

Static Site Generators
100 100%
Static Site Generators
0% 0
Website Monitoring
0 0%
Website Monitoring
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Performance Monitoring
0 0%
Performance Monitoring
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Pages and WebPagetest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GitHub Pages and WebPagetest

GitHub Pages Reviews

Exploring alternatives to Vercel: A guide for web developers
GitHub Pages is a free hosting service provided by GitHub, primarily intended for hosting static sites directly from a GitHub repository. While it lacks some of the advanced features found in other platforms, its simplicity and integration with GitHub make it an attractive option for certain types of projects.
Source: fleek.xyz
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Static Site Generators — It is a good way for developers to build sites on GitHub pages with the help of site generators. Yes, it has the ability to publish and release any static file. But it is recommended to proceed with Jekyll.
Source: blog.back4app.com

WebPagetest Reviews

We have no reviews of WebPagetest yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Pages should be more popular than WebPagetest. It has been mentiond 495 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Pages mentions (495)

View more

WebPagetest mentions (51)

  • A PageSpeed insight report, but for every page in your domain
    Trust neither. The most optimal option I've found is webpagetest.org Its been quite handy lately. This tool does look interesting. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How are you all accurately checking your website load time? Not sure PageSpeedInsights is very helpful.
    Webpagetest.org is another. Pagespeedinsights and lighthouse are great for identifying page load issues to fix, but actual page load times will always vary between the user and your web server. Universal analytics has some page load timings but that's going away soon and nothing afaik is in GA4. I've seen an example of building a page load timer in tag manager and dumping the results into an event. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Extreme confusing over Speed Index results -- webpagetest.org
    So I am working on rebuilding our company's site with a new stack. I am running tests using webpagetest.org, and I am having trouble fully understanding the speed index results as well as the film strip view. The page renders quite fast everywhere I test it. Google Lighthouse shows it in the 90s + for performance score, however when I test the page on webpagetest, I get load times of 77 seconds (NOT MS) which is... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Does anyone else experience pure ecstasy when they get 100 on Lighthouse? 😩
    Webpagetest.org is great, and checking OP's site they have done an incredible job, I don't think I have ever made or seen an Ecom site this slick. Super clean waterfall view. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Performance scores for Google Lighthouse/Insights seem to be very inaccurate
    Thanks for the recommendation regarding webpagetest.org, another user made a similar recommendation so I will check it out. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Pages and WebPagetest, you can also consider the following products

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

GTmetrix - GTmetrix is a free tool that analyzes your page's speed performance. Using PageSpeed and YSlow, GTmetrix generates scores for your pages and offers actionable recommendations on how to fix them.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

PageSpeed Insights - PageSpeed is addon for ...

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

Google Lighthouse - Lighthouse is an open-source, automated tool for improving the quality of web pages.

Loading...