GitHub Gist VS StackEdit

If you are learning things, you could also create github gists. That way your repos will only be coding related, while you can create tutorials / work exercises in gists. Source: over 1 year ago

I use Github, both for full repos and for short gists. Source: about 2 years ago

On the other hand, shared DartPads are just gists on GitHub so theoretically they can include code that works with different packages. Of course, such gists will not compile in DartPad and will be displayed as having errors :(. Source: over 2 years ago

Perhaps github gists? https://gist.github.com/discover. Source: over 2 years ago

I looked at Github gists, but they are focused in displaying the markdown sourcecode (so e.g. Hyperlinks won't be clickable [1] ). Options just don't seem to be focused on simply hosting PDFs/information with clickable references. Source: over 2 years ago

Alternatively, you can use an online markdown editor like StackEdit or HackMD. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Use https://stackedit.io/ in the browser :). Source: 5 months ago

Markdown is awesome! But, when writing 1000 words+ articles, I quickly feel the need for a better experience. For years, I’ve used StackEdit — an open-source, in-browser Markdown editor — for editing all kinds of long-format Markdown text. That said, given my recent experience with WYSIWYG editors, I thought I could do something better. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

This is especially annoying as when I export from stackedit.io to HTML, then it just cuts off anything which is outside the greyed in code window! Source: 10 months ago

StackEdit[0] pretty much perfected what I needed out of a markdown editor - I just need somewhere to write my tickets/docs that wasn't Github so that I could format it properly while writing. I still use it from time to time [0]: https://stackedit.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago