Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitHub Flavored Markdown VS DokuWiki

Compare GitHub Flavored Markdown VS DokuWiki and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GitHub Flavored Markdown logo GitHub Flavored Markdown

GitHub uses "GitHub Flavored Markdown," or GFM, across the site--in issues, comments, and...

DokuWiki logo DokuWiki

DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.
  • GitHub Flavored Markdown Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • DokuWiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

GitHub Flavored Markdown features and specs

  • Widespread Usage
    GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM) is widely used in the GitHub community, making it a popular choice for collaborating on open-source projects and documenting code repositories.
  • Enhanced Features
    GFM extends the standard Markdown with additional features like tables, strikethrough, and syntax highlighting, allowing for more expressive and informative content.
  • Version Control Integration
    GFM is seamlessly integrated with GitHub’s version control system, making it easy to track changes, collaborate on documentation, and propose updates through pull requests.
  • Live Preview
    GitHub provides a live preview of Markdown files, which helps users see how their Markdown will render, ensuring the final document looks as expected.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Since GFM is based on Markdown, documents can be easily shared and rendered across different platforms and services, retaining consistent formatting.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Flavored Markdown

  • Limited Advanced Formatting
    While GFM offers several enhancements over standard Markdown, it still lacks support for some advanced formatting options found in richer text editors or other markup languages.
  • GitHub Dependency
    GFM is primarily designed to work within the GitHub ecosystem, which can limit usefulness outside of GitHub, especially if using features specific to GFM.
  • Learning Curve
    Users familiar with standard Markdown might need to learn the additional syntax and features of GFM, which can be an initial barrier for some.
  • Consistency Issues
    Rendering consistency might vary when GFM documents are viewed outside of GitHub, as some features might not be supported in other Markdown processors.

DokuWiki features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    DokuWiki is known for its simple and straightforward installation process. It does not require a database, making it easy for users to set up and manage.
  • File-based Storage
    Instead of using a database, DokuWiki stores its data in text files. This makes it easy to backup, transfer, and maintain.
  • Extensibility
    DokuWiki has a wide range of plugins and templates available, which allows users to extend its functionality and customize its appearance.
  • Built-in Access Controls
    DokuWiki provides built-in access controls and authentication mechanisms, allowing administrators to manage user permissions effectively.
  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Friendly
    DokuWiki is designed to be SEO-friendly, making content more discoverable by search engines.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, DokuWiki is free to use and benefits from community contributions and support.

Possible disadvantages of DokuWiki

  • Limited Scalability
    Due to its file-based storage, DokuWiki may face performance issues as the amount of content grows significantly.
  • Learning Curve
    Though it is user-friendly, users without technical knowledge might still find it challenging to utilize advanced features or customize their wiki.
  • Basic Features
    While it covers the basics well, some users may find DokuWiki lacking in advanced features compared to other wiki software.
  • Plugin Dependency
    While extensibility is a pro, relying on plugins for additional functionality can lead to maintenance issues, especially if plugins become outdated or incompatible.
  • Less Professional Support
    As an open-source project, professional support is limited compared to commercial options. Users primarily rely on community support.

Analysis of DokuWiki

Overall verdict

  • DokuWiki is a well-regarded choice, particularly for users who need a straightforward and reliable wiki solution without the overhead of a database. It is suitable for both personal use and small to medium-sized enterprises seeking an efficient documentation system.

Why this product is good

  • DokuWiki is considered a good option for its simplicity and ease of use. It is a versatile and lightweight wiki software that doesn't require a database, making it easy to install and maintain. It uses plain text files, which simplifies backups and data portability. DokuWiki also supports a range of plugins and templates, allowing for customization, and it includes features like version control, access control lists, and multilingual support.

Recommended for

    DokuWiki is recommended for individuals or organizations looking for a simple, no-database wiki system. It is especially suitable for small teams, educational projects, personal knowledge management, and internal company documentation that prioritizes ease of use and low maintenance.

GitHub Flavored Markdown videos

Demystifying Markdown – Learn GitHub flavored Markdown (GFM) on Skillshare | Clyde D'Souza

DokuWiki videos

Dokuwiki Tutorial: Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Dokuwiki: Quick Walk Through

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Flavored Markdown and DokuWiki)
Documentation
100 100%
0% 0
WiKis
0 0%
100% 100
Documentation As A Service & Tools
Note Taking
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Flavored Markdown and DokuWiki. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GitHub Flavored Markdown and DokuWiki

GitHub Flavored Markdown Reviews

We have no reviews of GitHub Flavored Markdown yet.
Be the first one to post

DokuWiki Reviews

Top 12 Self-hosted Wiki Engines for 2024: A Comprehensive Guide
DokuWiki is an open-source wiki software that stands out for its simplicity and versatility. Key features include ease of installation and use, low system requirements, built-in access control lists, support for over 50 languages, and device independence. It doesn't require a database, making it easier to maintain and back up. DokuWiki is extensible with a large variety of...
Source: medevel.com
The 10 Best Self-hosted Wiki Software for Linux System
Dokuwiki is a highly flexible and easy-to-use open source wiki software that does not require a database. Many users love it due to its ease to use and fluent syntax. The lack of limitations, backup, and installation make it the favorite of any user who wishes to maintain a collaborative website.
Best 11 Open-source Free Wiki Engines for teams and enterprise in 2022
DokuWiki is a popular PHP-based open-source wiki that has been standing for years. It offers a multilingual support as it packed by a large community of experienced users and developer from all over the world.
Source: medevel.com
The Best 20 Wiki Software For Your Business& Internal Knowledge for 2022
DocuWiki is a versatile open-source wiki tool that is noted for its clean and readable syntax. Feature-packed and easy to install, this software can be used to build a corporate wiki, private notebook, and software manual. Its built-in access controls and authentication connectors make it a perfect choice for enterprises looking for a solid security system. Creating a...
17 open source wiki engine/software
DokuWiki is a lightweight, standards compliant free PHP Wiki engine that allow you to create any kind of documentation. It has a simple yet powerful syntax which makes sure the data files remain readable outside the Wiki and eases the creation of structured texts. All data stored in plain text files – no database backend are required.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Flavored Markdown seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Flavored Markdown mentions (1)

  • Resources for proper putting of code on to GitHub ?
    Not sure quite what you mean. Are you asking "what should I put on GitHub" or "how to make it look pretty?" For the latter, check out https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github. Source: about 2 years ago

DokuWiki mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of DokuWiki yet. Tracking of DokuWiki recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Flavored Markdown and DokuWiki, you can also consider the following products

Text::Amuse - Markup language for AMuseWiki.

MediaWiki - MediaWiki is a free software wiki package written in PHP, originally for use on Wikipedia.

Caoutchouc - Typesetting language using Markdown and AsciiMath to format documents

TiddlyWiki - a non-linear personal web notebook

Groff - The groff (GNU troff) software is a typesetting package which reads plain text mixed with...

XWiki - A powerful Open Source collaborative platform enhancing collaboration and communication.