GitHub Enterprise VS Gitolite

Some orgs run GitHub Enterprise on-prem. Set up properly, it's not publicly accessible at all. Source: about 1 year ago

I do. My company has an enterprise license and it basically just acts as a private corner of normal public-facing github. Basically like a private repo but instead of being scoped to a single repo it's a full multi-organization scope. All new report default to private, but can be flipped to public if we want to open-source some internal project. Source: about 1 year ago

Https://github.com/enterprise you can host it yourself or in the cloud. Source: about 2 years ago

Well that confirms I can't afford it! Interestingly, this page isn't linked to from https://github.com/enterprise (except in the footer), where the calls to action are to either "start a free trial" or to "contact sales". - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Ruby support for CodeQL is now coming in public beta, and secret scanning is now available to all GitHub Enterprise users. There's also the new security center we just launched in beta. This allows you to better manage your secrets, tokens, and credentials. Check out more about GitHub Enterprise on the website. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

People also forget about Gitolite, which provides lightweight shared access control around Git+SSH+server-repos. For me it's a much simpler alternative than systems with a heavyweight web UI. Although to be honest I don't know whether Gitolite handles SHA256 hashes (I've never tested it). https://gitolite.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Gitolite is awesome if there's no need for web frontend and easy to setup. Source: about 2 years ago